User talk:Marieltrokan

November 2016

Hello, I'm Dane2007. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Conjuring 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure to read our original research, verifiability and neutral point of view policies as your editing history does not comply with these up to this point. -- Dane2007 ^talk 21:15, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marieltrokan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Marieltrokan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

conjuring

I reverted your edits since you've not gotten the catch to citing. I'm not sure how relevant the review is in this case... and please, use the sandbox to practice referencing. Me and another person replied to you at the help desk with some more info. --Jennica✿^{talk / contribs} 17:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Conjuring 2

The source you used for "Symbolism" does not comply with the reliable sourcing policy. Please review this and refrain from making further edits that do not comply. -- Dane2007 ^talk 05:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Conjuring 2.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Official third level warning. Please see comment above and I recommend proposing your changes using {{edit requested}} on the articles talk page so that they can be reviewed prior to inclusion. -- Dane2007 ^talk 05:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]