User talk:Markuswestermoen

Welcome!

Hello, Markuswestermoen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mediran ^{talk to me!} 12:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MacGregor International AB

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MacGregor International AB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 12:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Markuswestermoen, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Markuswestermoen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Active heave compensation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rkjtc (talk) 14:02, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

conscientious objection

Hi Markuswestermoen -- I reversed your changes on conscientious objection. That entry is defined at the top as being about conscientious objection to military service, which is the universal definition of that phrase. I recognize that people in other fields analogize their refusal to perform job duties in those fields, but that's an analogy; it's not part of the definition of CO. I believe that what would be most appropriate here would be to have an article on refusal to perform duties in non-military fields, that referenced conscientious objection as the explanation / analogy given by those workers. Then the CO article is linked to the other article in the appropriate fashion.

Just FYI, I'll note that the reason the analogy is often challenged is that military service has historically included conscription and other non-voluntary aspects, which professionals like pharmacy, nursing, etc., do not have, and that CO by law generally requires objection to the entire profession.

--Lquilter (talk) 13:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Apportionment paradox may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Representatives in the United States Congress - Paradoxes of Apportionment], Michael J. Caulfield]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]