User talk:MatthewLiberal

Jay Pritzker Pavilion

I saw your commentary at Talk:Jay Pritzker Pavilion. Since you have more expertise than I on the topic, why don't you edit the page as correctly as you can. All the information on the page is referenced so that you can see the original source that I tried to use. It is on my watchlist.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I'll try to get back there sometime and spiff up the section a bit. --MatthewLiberal 00:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. You may want to add this somewhere:

This user helped promote Jay Pritzker Pavilion to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 02:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI,

This user helped promote Jay Pritzker Pavilion to featured article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

chatter from ManOnPipes

I just saw your contributions to the Mark Saul page I started. Looks pretty good IMO -- curious why the change between "Highland bagpipe" to "Highland Bagpipe"? I let MSaul know about this page via his MySpace profile -- said he'd try to send me more info to build the page up with, tho that's been a bit back... I figure he's pretty busy right now, what with trying to finish up his 2nd album and this GHB tuner. Anyway, I'm curious about the b/Bagpipe change -- my guess is that with the word "Highland" it becomes a proper name -- I tend to be better with punctuation than grammar ... and we won't talk about spelling ;D ManOnPipes 22:57, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Highland bagpipes' implies an adjective (Highland) modifying a generic noun (bagpipes), while 'Highland Bagpipes' denotes a specific instrument. Although pipers talk informally about 'pipes,' which is assumed to stand in for the cumbersome 'Great Highland Bagpipes,' I think it's more accurate to talk about 'Highland Pipes' in this context. Personally, I strive for specificity because many people do not know that there are kinds of bagpipes other than the Great Highland ones. Anyway, this isn't a big deal; it's really more my pet peeve. I did a little more work on the article, by the way. --MatthewLiberal (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to stolen generation.

Thankyou. It was not on purpose. My computer did that automatically when I added the ^{[citation needed]} tags. And I do not welcome your patronising tone re: the sandbox.OzWoden (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Life, the Universe, and Wikipedia

I blame you for everything. Having finally made an account, it is now totally and utterly impossible for me to ever get any work done. Congratulations, you've dragged me down to your procrastination level... We should get married. --ShadowSpinner9 (talk) 22:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Pritzker Pavilion FAC notice

Thanks for your involvement in the development of Jay Pritzker Pavilion article. You may want to comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jay Pritzker Pavilion/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monaghan Pipe Band for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monaghan Pipe Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monaghan Pipe Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James^x1 2345 17:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charleston Police Pipes and Drums

The article Charleston Police Pipes and Drums has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saffron United Pipe Band

The article Saffron United Pipe Band has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I agree with User:Freechild, doesn't meet WP:ORG, WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for over six years and no editor has established it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scotia-Glenville Pipe Band for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scotia-Glenville Pipe Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotia-Glenville Pipe Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Scotia-Glenville Pipe Band.jpg

The file File:Scotia-Glenville Pipe Band.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manchester Pipe Band for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchester Pipe Band is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester Pipe Band until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 00:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Midwest Pipe Band Association

The article Midwest Pipe Band Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources and no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Western United States Pipe Band Association

The article Western United States Pipe Band Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 12:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eastern United States Pipe Band Association

The article Eastern United States Pipe Band Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking secondary sources, does not meet WP:NORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 19:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]