Talk goes here.
- 1 Please watch
- 2 Shoulder
- 3 Welcome
- 4 Anatomy
- 5 Ampulla of Vater
- 6 Biceps brachii muscle
- 7 Tooth
- 8 Aquaretics
- 9 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 10 Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
- 11 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hi there: there is nothinh wrong with those short stub articles , but why not write a full-length article on the Shoulder Joint?--Anthony.bradbury 21:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- Because the shoulder joint is too complex for a single article. Please see the anatomy project. Mauvila 21:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.
I've noticed that you've been editing medicine related articles --from your contributions. We have a place where the medically minded people hang out: WikiProject "Clinical Medicine". You are invited to join or just browse the talk page, which is also known as the doctors' mess.
Thanks for all your work on the anatomy articles. --Arcadian 23:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's no problem for me. I have a gross anatomy test coming up on all the articles I am editing, so it really is a great review. Mauvila 00:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Ampulla of Vater
Thank you for your clarification on the Biceps brachii page. I've been working to gather information and rewrite bits (which I have not yet added), but couldn't figure out how best to fix the confusing text about the triarticulation of the biceps. --EncycloPetey 01:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- No problem Mauvila 19:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you were involved with Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy, and I need some feedback! I had asked a question about the Tooth article because I do not know what would be the best way to deal with information on human vs animal teeth. Most of the information is about human teeth. So, should there be a separate "animal teeth" article that the section should show as the main article or should the majority of the content in the tooth article be moved to a "human tooth" (or would this be an exception to have plural: "human teeth") article? What are your thoughts on the matter? My initial instinct was to keep the article as is and make a new article about animal teeth for the section to refer to, but I did not know if most anatomy articles try to keep a certain format when addressing that issue. I have had one suggestion to move most of the information to a "human tooth" or "human teeth" article. I would appreciate any ideas. Thanks! - Dozenist talk 13:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I have elaborated on your initial objections listed on talk:aquaretics and have cited sources describing what the term "aquaretic" really means as well as others which summarily reject the alternative remedies listed as aquaretics, by the technical definition (although one or two are actually diuretics.) Your comment would be greatly appreciated, as would your input on how to improve the (currently dismal, inaccurate, and unsourced) article. --Kajerm (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.
You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
- Publish an article to the journal. Even a medical student like you can make a submission.
- Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
- Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
- Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
- Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
- Join the editorial board.
- Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
- Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
- Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Technical work like template designing for the journal.
- Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
- Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.