User talk:Mazbel/Archive 1

Re: Reverted?

Yes, see my explanation on the article talk page.

Stop it

Hey, what are you doing with User talk:Cryellow? He is entitled to remove almost anything from his own talk page per WP:BLANKING. The only thing that has to stay is the active block sanction. Please stop edit-warring and warning him. Elizium23 (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it right now

Hi, Leitoxx. Please stop reverting Cryellow on his own userpage immediately.

Cryellow is within his rights to remove any thing he likes; he doesn't have to give a reason; and removed material should not be reinserted by anybody. Still less should he be warned for doing what he has a right to do. The templates you're using on his page are intended for people who have removed material from articles and similar pages; they're not to be used on userpages. I see you have been warning other users for the same thing, for instance here. This is a misunderstanding on your part. People have wide leeway in how they manage their own talkpage, and if you reinsert something they've removed, I'm afraid it's you who're breaking the rules, and you may be blocked from editing.

I see you continued to revert after Elizium23's warning above. Is English your native language? If you have trouble understanding advice and warnings from other editors here, the English Wikipedia may not be the best wiki for you, Bishonen | talk 00:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Your signature

Hi Leitoxx, the policeman image in your signature is going to need to be removed. Our policy on signatures specifically says that they cannot contain images (see WP:SIG#Images) . Please take the image out of your signature at your earliest convenience.

This second part is not something you do have to do, but I ask you to consider taking the "The Police" line out of your signature too. This "police" metaphor for recent changes patrol is widespread, but troubling, and I think leads to the wrong "state of mind" when looking at recent changes. But it is not a violation of policy, and can remain if you want it to.

Thank you. And thanks for helping out. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't mean change the image, I mean remove the image. I see you haven't actually done this yet, in spite of your comment on my talk page. Please do so right now; I do not want to have to make a big deal over this. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see the problem. I do not mean the image on your user page, I mean the image in your signature. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Leitoxx. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User requested deletion?

Why did you make this edit? The user did not request deletion of their user page, as far as I can tell. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]