User talk:Member1494
Member1494, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Member1494! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
Relevant information
[edit]Removing the SoS from the PPS' pages is not helpful. The PPS is chosen by and serves the SoS, it is relevant information. TheMace09 (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit]
Hello, I'm Viewratio. I noticed that you recently removed content from John Nash, Baron Nash without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Viewratio (talk) 21:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Removal of unpaid positions from officeholder inbox
[edit]Hi Member1494 (talk · contribs). I notice you've been wholesale removing positions such as PPS and AW from the Officeholder Infobox on UK MPs. I'm a bit confused by the change as I don't think anyone would dispute that PPS and AW are 'offices', and there is no requirement for an office to be paid to be considered as such. Has some kind of consensus been established for this change? Hugsyrup (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Hugsyrup (talk · contribs) there was a precedent until fairly recently that roles that are often not very well documented (such as assistant whips or departmental PPS, which often change without a clear successor or are left unfilled) to be omitted infoboxes have a tendency to become incorrect/messy/inconsistent in such circumstances. I do not dispute that they are indeed positions, however given their junior status and the fact they carry with them no official status within the parliamentary hierarchy that they would be better kept into the body of the text. Parliamentary Under Secretary and above would be appropriate for infoboxes. I don't know why the role as a PPS could not just be a line within the 'parliamentary career' section of most articles. Happy to discuss further ways to improve and standardise the system as I believe this would be beneficial to the articles.
- Thanks for the reply. I've replied at the infobox talk page to keep everything in one place. Hugsyrup (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alister Jack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Clark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nus Ghani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iain Stewart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Eustice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Heath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oliver Dowden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HMG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)