User talk:MessierAZ

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garden of the Gods Trading Post (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Garden of the Gods Trading Post and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Garden of the Gods Trading Post concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Garden of the Gods Trading Post, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Garden of the Gods Trading Post concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Garden of the Gods Trading Post, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garden of the Gods Trading Post (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphim System was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NORG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Garden of the Gods Trading Post and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Garden of the Gods Trading Post, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seraphim System ^(talk) 02:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! MessierAZ, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seraphim System ^(talk) 02:34, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garden of the Gods Trading Post has been accepted

Garden of the Gods Trading Post, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:56, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI edits? Authors Pat & Kim Messier - Book Garden of the Gods Trading Post: Images of America(2019)

Hello, MessierAZ. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jooojay (talk) 04:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No COI

We are not employed or otherwise associated with the Trading Post, nor do we live in Colorado Springs, we live in Tucson, AZ. We are independent researchers and the subject matter fascinated us, we spent years researching the founder and history before we published this book. We made the citation edit on Feb 17 because our book has the most information on the subject so thought it would be the best reference to cite. MessierAZ (talk) 02:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)MessierAZ[reply]

Hi, thank you for responding. Unfortunately it is considered a COI when you published a research book on the subject matter you are sharing on Wikipedia, also see WP:ORIGINAL, WP:SELFPUB. This subject did not have a WP article prior to your creation of it, and it's the subject of one of your books - which is used as one of the main citations. It looks a lot like indirect advertising. Please read through the provided links to better understanding how to participate in this community. Today I have corrected the editing error you were experiencing on the citation. Thanks, feel free to use my talk page if you have questions or use the tea house. Jooojay (talk) 07:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jooojay (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am saddened that you thought my revisions were Edit Warring. I made a few corrections and inadvertently published the changes after each minor edit. The morning of Feb18 I was correcting a citation error that resulted from an editors reversion of one of my edits yesterday.

This is what I'm trying to fix, if someone would do it for me I would be grateful.

" Messier, Pat; Messier, Kim (2014). Reassessing Hallmarks of Native Southwest Jewelry. Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer Publishing. pp. 88–91. ISBN 978-0-7643-4670-5. Cite error: The named reference ":0" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page)."

MessierAZ (talk) 22:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)MessierAZ[reply]