User talk:Mfregeau

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Violet Blue (porn star). Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tabercil 11:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Quebec, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ri Myong-su has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 15:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Allen3. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Demagogue, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Allen3 ^talk 20:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Mr X 22:33, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Donald Trump. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 22:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Mfregeau (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21320 was submitted on Apr 24, 2018 18:38:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mfregeau (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I understand that I used me account in the past to limit myself into doing minor edits to some pages without valid sources and have engaged in defamation against some living politicians. I will refrain from doing so in the future and intend to use my wikipedia account for more constructive content, including new pages.

Decline reason:

No response to the request below in more than two weeks. Please make a new unblock request when you are ready to respond. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:08, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, can you add specifics about constructive edits you would make.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:56, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]