User talk:Mhdswiki

March 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Bangladesh–Japan relations‎ has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. [1] // Timothy :: talk 19:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BoonDock. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.BoonDock (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with any information I have changed, you can easily tell me and I don't know what rules or cyber security are required for such changes because it is easy to know who changed the information through my public real IP. Can you tell me if any security measures are beneficial for me.As I have made detailed and significant changes to the weapons in Bangladesh Navy's submarine project project which are completely removed within hours so if you are experienced in this matter please help me out whether these changes should be made even if they are 90% accurate. can Mahdi Sling (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have done all sorts of weird stuff. Broken references, deleted random text, copied one half of a paragraph into the middle of another, broken table formatting etc. Honestly, it's not even about the poor spelling and lack of verifiability of what you have changed, It was too many bad changes. You need to use the preview button before saving and if there are big red words, don't save! When you insert a reference, I suggest you use the menu option that is labelled "CITE". and the automatic mode, then it will generate the entire reference for you. You just have to make sure you click in the correct place. BoonDock (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BoonDock thanks Mahdi Sling (talk) 23:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey brother, stop getting attached in GDP just for eye candy there will be another forecast revision by IMF and also GDP does not represent true reflection of economy. Maoylord (talk) 04:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Forces Goal 2030. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, BD Defence Lovers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, BD Defence Lovers. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Bangladesh Armed Forces. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bangladesh Armed Forces. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Uncle Spock (talk) 16:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this page as it's not what Wikipedia articles are meant to be used for - if you want to meet other editors who are interested in improving articles about Bangladesh, see WP:WikiProject Bangladesh. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 20:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle Spock Thanks for your message 🙏.I am new to wiki source editing so I have little knowledge about new projects. But as a contributor, I have been working sincerely to add new information and update the information very carefully from reliable sources. At first, I faced several problems including citations, and grammatical , sentences mistakes after publishing it takes sometimes a day to correct only for a proper citation. I think source editing is very difficult and it will be easier for us to help of many types of apps to automatically troubleshoot the data before publish ant it has taken minimum few hours to complete publish. Mhdswiki (talk) 01:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]