User talk:MichaelScheufele

Welcome!

Hi MichaelScheufele! I noticed your contributions to Draft:William Jay Schieffelin and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 18:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sigrandson,

Thank you for your message!

Yes, currently I'm creating an article about William Jay Schieffelin.

His name is mentioned in many other articles in Wikipedia. So, I thought it would be a good idea to write about him.

Yes, it was a great pleasure to write this article in Wikipedia!

I noticed that Wikipedia attaches great importance to reliable sources. That’s understandable. I will therefore try to cite several, independent and reliable sources for all statements in my article.

I now look forward to having the article reviewed by an experienced editor and publishing it.

Many thanks for your support!

Best regards,

Michael Scheufele MichaelScheufele (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now that's what I call being encouraged! Hope your draft makes the cut soon (as I hope my current slate soon will). --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 11:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Thanks for contributing to the article Charles Bosanquet (academic). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, MichaelScheufele. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Both writing about your relatives, and citing a work you wrote as the main reference in said articles, are forms of conflict of interest that should be disclosed. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosguill,

Thanks for checking my articles about the Schieffelin family for possible conflicts of interest.

I can confirm that I have no external relationship to all the persons mentioned in my articles because they are no living persons. Also, the company Schieffelin & Co does not exist anymore.

In my articles I often quote from my book about the Schieffelin family. But I only quote parts from my book that are also confirmed by other independent sources, and I have usually added these sources in the articles.

I also have no interest to promote my book out of commercial reasons, because my book is available through Open Access, so everyone can do a free download of the book.

I felt it was a gap that there were no biographical articles about these persons in Wikipedia. Now I hope, by creating these articles, to close these gaps and thereby to make Wikipedia better and more informative and more objective and more connected by links between biographies.

I always try my best to reach this goal, and I try to avoid manipulation.

Thanks, and best regards,

Michael Scheufele MichaelScheufele (talk) 12:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's definition of conflict-of-interest is quite broad, and is not limited to commercial interests: you are still considered to have a conflict of interest in these contexts. Please read through WP:COI carefully and comply with the disclosure instructions on your user page and on the talk pages of affected articles. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rosguill, now I have added my COI declaration to my user page and on the talk pages of my articles. Best regards, Michael Scheufele MichaelScheufele (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Lawrence Schieffelin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Lawrence Schieffelin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Lawrence Schieffelin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]