User talk:Milutin Bukva

Welcome

Hello Milutin Bukva and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Serbian Party Oathkeepers, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Joyous! Noise! 23:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Serbian Party Oathkeepers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Please give our WP:NPOV policy a read as well. Staraction (talk | contribs) 05:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Serbian Party Oathkeepers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Staraction (talk | contribs) 05:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking on Serbian Party Oathkeepers

Hi, this is Joyous! again. I'm sorry, but you can't simply delete parts of an article that you're unhappy with. If the material is incorrect, you can correct it with additional sourced information. You can also start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what the problem is. But, if you keep removing large chunks of the article, your account will be blocked. Joyous! Noise! 23:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Serbian Party Oathkeepers. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Serbian Party Oathkeepers was changed by Milutin Bukva (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930019 on 2024-04-10T05:38:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Serbian Oathkeepers Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]