Jump to content

User talk:Minohaha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Minohaha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Kndimov (talk) 21:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Egyptian coup d'état / 2013 Egyptian roadmap announcement

[edit]

Please do not unilaterally make a controversial move to a page of such importance like you did here. If you wish, you may open a discussion and ask for the page to be moved. If there is consensus, the page will be moved. For more details, please see Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! -- Kndimov (talk) 21:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Entsar Amer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 23:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Entsar Amer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. obi2canibetalk contr 17:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Entsar Amer for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Entsar Amer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entsar Amer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. obi2canibetalk contr 13:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

I know this comes late, but apparently you weren't the sock master and we were quick to judge, an accusation for which I sincerely apologize. I just need you to understand that I deal with such behavior a lot in here and this one looked more obvious than any others, considering that the master editor didn't even participate in the discussion. Again, I sincerely apologize and I hope you come back to editing Wikipedia again without being mad with us. Cheers, Fitzcarmalan (talk) 08:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]