User talk:Missing Boast

Welcome

Hello Missing Boast and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Oldest people, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 09:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Oldest people has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Oldest people was changed by Missing Boast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973499 on 2017-09-20T09:51:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oldest people. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --John Cline (talk) 09:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oldest people, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oldest people. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Missing Boast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to edit. Missing Boast (talk) 10:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but accounts that repeatedly violate Wikipedia's policies and vandalize don't get to keep their editing rights while it's occurring. Consider reading the instructions fully before requesting your account be unblocked :-). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Missing Boast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not vandalize any more. Missing Boast (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your editing history speaks to the opposite. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Missing Boast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

From now I will stop vandalizing not like before. Missing Boast (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 14:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, further spurious unblock requests will result in your talk page access being removed. Please please read the above message carefully before requesting unblock again. You know you were mucking around, and this just isn't the place for that -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 14:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Missing Boast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not. Missing Boast (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Fair enough. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.