User talk:Mistipolis

Welcome!

Hello, Mistipolis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sunrise Movement. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 13:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mistipolis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:51, Saturday, August 31, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saagar Enjeti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rising and The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saagar Enjeti

The article Saagar Enjeti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability criteria at WP:ANYBIO. Notability is reached by what reliable sources says about the subject, not what the subject says.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 23:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saagar Enjeti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saagar Enjeti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saagar Enjeti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Laughter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Laughter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saagar Enjeti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Izzy Award

Hi Mistipolis, regarding the quote for the Izzy Award (on The Lever), it seems relevant to me what the award was for. If you think the full quote is too much, I suggest something like:

In granting this award, the judges commented that The Lever is relentless "in exposing the corrupting influence of corporate power on government and both major parties."

I will defer to your judgement on this, because life is short. :)

But I think this info is warranted, especially because it reinforces the previous quote by Krystal Ball. It is part of the narrative.

Best regards, Dorje108 (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dorje, I think your edits have been great overall, and I appreciate the effort you've put in to making the article read well. As regards the Izzy Award quote, I worry that it feels biased to include for an article that is walking a tight rope and will likely face an AfD. It is a direct quote from a credible institution but there are a fair amount of independent media award organizations out there. You put more effort in than me so you deserve to make the final decision. I think your abbreviated version is better, but just bear in mind what people who have more institutional leverage than us on this site will think when reading it. Mistipolis (talk) 23:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mistipolis,

Thanks for the feedback. I understand your concerns. It is difficult to predict how other editors will react to the article. Regarding the quote, I am going to leave it alone for now (without the quote). I will just wait and see what develops. I appreciate your input. It helps to have another point of view. Cheers. Dorje108 (talk) 23:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hi Mistipolis, just wanted to add that I think it is very helpful to think through potential issues with the article before any type of potential review by other editors. So I appreciate the points you are raising. Cheers. Dorje108 (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have discussed the redirect here: User_talk:Red-tailed_hawk#"The_Lever"_article

I might follow up on that thread tomorrow with more questions. Dorje108 (talk) 03:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]