User talk:Mmacken3

Mmacken3, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mmacken3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luna Press Publishing (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luna Press Publishing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luna Press Publishing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Luna Press Publishing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Notes

I'm not a bot, I'm an admin. Bot posts are almost always signed with a name ending in bot, and that ending is not allowed for human editors. OK. Please note that having an article on Wikipedia is dependent on notability. For companies, you should see WP:CORP, and as well for any sort of article WP:RS about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a directory or social media, and unlike them we have restrictions. Also unlike them, we do not allow advertising or promotion, or things that resemble advertising or promotion. While you did manage not to use PR jargon, an article that is just a listing of products (or in this case, authors and illustrators and their works) looks like an attempt to put them before the public. Likewise, the use of symbols such as ™ usually indicates company involvement. That symbol, and the ones for copyright and registration, are not used on Wikipedia. References should be independent and reliable. They should be more than mentions in passing. Directory entries, including entries in publications like the Handbook, don't count for notability, and mentions by affiliated or associated organisations don't either. Having said all that, I wish the Press luck and success. But do remember that just being a publisher, or an author, is not a guarantee of an article here. What is needed is reviews in places other than Amazon or Goodreads (or blogs with a few exceptions like The Huffington Post...). If a good number of the authors and their works can be shown to have notability, the Press will be more likely to have it too. I'm not suggesting a flood of articles about the authors - I am suggesting getting reviews in places that the mainstream publishers get reviews in. (That's usually good for sales, too...). Anyway, I like to see new publishers starting up, even if they don't seem to be ready to have an article yet. Prove me wrong. Look at articles about some of the main publishers and try a draft at User:Mmacken3/Luna (click and save) and when you think you've got something worth saying, let me know and I'll contact a rescuer who will help you. Peridon (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Luna Press Publishing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Luna Press Publishing, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)