User talk:Momomo951

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Momomo951 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It appears that i was blocked for putting Martin Shkreli's Birth date as march 17th 1983, which has sources behind it. I do not believe this is a valid reason to be blocked. I do understand that the edit i did, i should of had included a source. Now that i have read on how to edit articles properly on Wikipedia i now can become a more productive member for Wikipedia. I will be extremely careful about causing unintentional damage from now on. I understand i make 2 edits previous to the Martin Shkreli edit, which were considered nonconstructive. I apologize for these edits, and understand they were wrong. I have a history of constructive edits on this site and would like to continue making Wikipedia a better website.

Decline reason:

I took a look through your edit history to see if your claim of "a history of constructive edits" was accurate. I immediately found this edit. It's very clear your claim of causing "unintentional damage" is inaccurate, and the problems extend beyond the one article. Yamla (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Momomo951 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It appears that i was blocked for putting Martin Shkreli's Birth date as march 17th 1983, which has sources behind it. I do not believe this is a valid reason to be blocked.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Momomo951 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It appears that i was blocked for putting Martin Shkreli's Birth date as march 17th 1983, which has sources behind it. I do not believe this is a valid reason to be blocked. I do understand that the edit i did, i should of had included a source. Now that i have read on how to edit articles properly on Wikipedia i now can become a more productive member for Wikipedia. I will be extremely careful about causing unintentional damage from now on.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock requests

You're wasting our time repeating yourself. Another example of your disruptive editing is here where you called someone a cuck. Doug Weller talk 14:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Momomo951 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is going to be my last unblocked request. I made 2 intentional edits in the same hour which were unconstructive, one on Cenk Ugyer's Wikipedia page about being an Armenian Genocide denier and another on Wikipedia's Wikipedia page about being funded by Saudi Arabia. and I would like to apologize for that. I was warned for these destructive edits and I released what I did was extremely unconstructive and bad for the website, so I decided that I'll start looking for mistakes and/or missing information on Wikipedia pages to improve the website. I was looking through Wikipedia and found that Martin Shkreli's birthday was missing from his page. I found an article which included tweets from Shkreli which indicated his birth day was March the 17th, 1983. I changed his date of birth on the Wikipedia article. Then I continued to look for more mistakes and missing info on other pages when I noticed my edit was reverted and the user who reverted my changes permanently blocked me from editing. Previous to me making the unconstructive edits about Saudi Arabia funding Wikipedia and Cenk Uyger being an Armenian genocide denier I have made constructive edits, like correcting mistakes on Trump's Cabinet page, or the 2008 Election results and the AMD Zen CPU's. These are only a few edits I've made that are constructive. I'd like to just have a second chance on this website and I will try my best to make this site more accurate.

Decline reason:

Your claim that you made just two unconstructive edits is false. I found much more: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:18, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.