User talk:MoonTruth
March 2012[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bart Sibrel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bart Sibrel was changed by MoonTruth (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-03-01T07:59:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Astronauts Gone Wild. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Bart Sibrel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ariconte (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Just provide a source (A reliable source, see WP:RS) and you will have a chance of getting that view accepted.
Ariconte (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)