User talk:MotionActivated435

unblock | reason=I am not a sock puppet account. There must be a mistake. Even Wikipedia states that people living or working in similar locations as blocked accounts can accidentally be banned. The editors have mistaken me for someone else. Please unblock me. I have broken no rules. MotionActivated435 (talk) 01:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)}}[reply]

Welcome!

Hi MotionActivated435! I noticed your contributions to María Elvira Salazar and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 19:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hi MotionActivated435! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not reverting or edit warring. You are deleting my additions. I have not deleted “far-right” or changed the sourcing.

Wikpedia supports balanced perspectives. It also prefers first-hand sources over second-hand opinions. But I still left the far-right language and sources.

I directly quoted McDaniel from a major magazine. The quote provided NPOV balance, but you deleted it. Therefore, I am not “edit warring” by adding the same quote. One could use that to stop any original contributions. MotionActivated435 (talk) 22:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is very important that you recognize that re-adding language is not “reverting.” Reverting is changing the mods decision, not adding new text. Plus, my contribution did joy violate any Wikipedia policy. MotionActivated435 (talk) 22:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MotionActivated435 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not violated any Wikipedia guidelines. I did not revert any deleted texts. Moreover, after the Mod advised me to first use the talk page — I did. I broke no policies while using Wikipedia. MotionActivated435 (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reasons you are blocked, namely the misuse of multiple accounts, and block evasion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MotionActivated435 (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]