Jump to content

User talk:Marquardtika

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit rather than delete

[edit]

Per the Tony Evers page, you would make it easier for other editors if you found alternate sources to official sources that you disagree with rather than deleting factual content. If you disagree with a source, it is best just to Google it and find if there are other (in this case, many) alternative sources rather than deleting the item entirely. GoldCoastPrior (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could just add WP:RS in the first place...Marquardtika (talk) 20:29, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
  • Traffic report: God only knows
    Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:50, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2025, Vol 11, Issue 8, Nos. 326, 327, 344, 345, 346


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

August 2025

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Edward Blum (activist). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Haun article

[edit]

Hi Marquardtika, I recently created an article draft for Katie Haun, a female venture capitalist and former federal prosecutor. Since you're a member of the WP:WOMRED, I hope you'll be willing to take a look - the draft can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Yaltaha29/Katie_Haun_draft. If you feel it's ready, I'd welcome your help in moving it to the mainspace. Thank you so much! Yaltaha29 (talk) 14:14, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look. Marquardtika (talk) 15:22, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Kates article

[edit]

Hi there, thank you for all the good work you're doing! I wanted to ask if the newly created Charlotte Kates article has been copied/translated from somewhere else at all? Just that some of the references have "retrieved" dates from last year. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I took some of it from Samidoun and forgot to attribute that. Any guidance on what I should do to address that? Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you've copied actual text and not just references, I'd recommend taking a look at WP:RIA and doing a dummy edit with text as the edit summary. Hope this helps. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is helpful, thank you--I'll fix this shortly. Marquardtika (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

CS1 error on NGO Monitor

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page NGO Monitor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:51, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Political Attack Adds

[edit]

I undid an item you reverted and published before I entered the reason -- I did put it on the talk page. here is the reason: == Inclusion of attack ads == I propose including a short, neutrally written section on "Political attacks / Attack ads." These ads are covered in reliable sources such as the Akron Beacon Journal, Cleveland.com, Ohio Capital Journal, Washington Post, and New York Times. Because Sykes represents a highly competitive district, repeated negative advertising campaigns have drawn significant press attention and are part of her documented political history. The content will be framed neutrally: who aired the ads, what claims they made, and how independent sources evaluated them. This follows precedent in other congressional biographies and aligns with WP:DUE, WP:V, and WP:NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthIsCurious (talk • contribs) 11:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 3, 2025

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 81567518W (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Miyares

[edit]

Hey there,

You've put several welcome messages on my talk pages over the years. My IP bounces quite a bit and mostly contribute to Virginia state politics and some federal politics and election results.

Anyway, a user removed a lot of content off Jason Miyares's page (some of it you welcomed me / thanked me for) and I was wondering if you could look at it and replace the things you find unfair for removal. Some of it makes absolutely no sense to me like getting rid of the elder abuse initiative the first for metro Richmond that the AG office set up or the lastgest housing settlement ever secured in Virginia by the AG Office.

I'd like an independent look at it. I think the page is getting a lot of traction after the Jay Jones scandal and users and turning to Miyares now unfairly. 216.103.177.73 (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to discuss content issues at Talk:Jason Miyares. I took a look at recent removals and it looks like some promotional stuff was removed. I don't see a problem. What specific content are you looking to re-add? Can you re-write it in a more neutral fashion and ensure that it is covered in independent sources? Marquardtika (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All of it was independently sourced by reliable sources. The housing settlement was argued by the AG Office, the largest in the state's history, makes no sense to remove it. The job fairs and veteran clinics are ongoing, not a one time affair. The drug prosecutions from the AG Office have caused VA tto have the strongest drug related death decline in the country. I guess I'll just add it back trimmed with another source(s). 216.103.177.73 (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard - Arabella

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Julian in LA (talk) 23:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

[edit]
  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about political issue

[edit]

Hi user:Marquardtika, I wanted to flag that your deletion of my recent edit on Ritchie Torres, a U.S. politician, was inconsistent with WP policy. You removed the word "controversial" from describing the congressman's policy on Israel. The subject is not just controversial -- it is only notable because of its controversy. If you delete the word "controversial," you risk whitewashing the article and denying readers important encyclopedic information about the subject. Mihir.pethe1 (talk) 05:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversial" is a subjective term. Do you have sourcing that says his policy on Israel is controversial? It seems to me a matter of opinion--it's controversial to people who don't like his policies (any of a politician's policies on anything can be deemed "controversial" by people who disagree with those policies). Marquardtika (talk) 13:39, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nasser bin Hamad Al Khalifa

[edit]

Hello, I work for His Highness Nasser bin Hamad Al Khalifa in the Office of His Majesty's Representative for Humanitarian Works and Youth Affairs. I noticed you've worked on HH's article in the past. I've made some suggestions at Talk:Nasser_bin_Hamad_Al_Khalifa#Updates_to_article_structure, and thought you may be interested in reviewing the request. Thank you, LolaDeJalima (talk) 07:21, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marquardtika, I was wondering if you may have any further thoughts about the Nasser bin Hamad Al Khalifa article and my suggestions for the structure. Appreciate your time, thanks. LolaDeJalima (talk) 16:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question on Dan Huberty Wikipedia page

[edit]

Hi there — thanks for your recent edits to the Dan Huberty page. I noticed some changes to the legislative history section and the photo. I wanted to reach out and understand your perspective so we can make sure the page stays accurate and follows Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I work with Dan Huberty and am helping ensure the article is up to date — for example, noting that he is now retired from the Texas House, serves as CEO of MoakCasey, and owns Capitol Cafe in Austin. I also noticed the photo keeps reverting; the professional photo from the Texas Legislature website seems to meet Wikipedia’s fair use and quality standards, but I’d love to hear your thoughts.

I’m new to editing Wikipedia and really want to collaborate rather than cause any conflicts. Could we discuss these changes here and reach a consensus on what’s appropriate per Wikipedia’s sourcing and neutrality policies?

Thanks for your time and edits! Themach1group (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Themach1group: Thanks for reaching out and disclosing your conflict of interest. You'll find some helpful info here. You can add proposed edits to the article's talk page and tag them with {{edit COI}} so that other editors may take a look and either agree that they should be implemented or give you feedback. Marquardtika (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arabella Advisors

[edit]

Dispute opened. Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Arabella Advisors Julian in LA (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Contentious Topic

[edit]

Information icon You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:32, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arun

[edit]

Hello Kindly requesting you not make any changes to revision related to article of Arun Subramanian. Please contact me if you want to make any meaningful changes or views that I can consider making these adjustments merely removing is not great. ~2025-34760-84 (talk) 15:24, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a warning that any further edits by you on this will result in a vandalisim complaint. ~2025-34838-74 (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Marquardtika this user is very likely to be a sock of User:~2025-34392-82, see this discussion. I've reported the TA to SPI(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/~2025-34392-82). Cheers! monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - December 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Arabella Advisors Julian in LA (talk) 17:10, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard discussion is at:

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Arabella Advisors#Editing of Wikipedia page

Julian in LA (talk) 22:57, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

[edit]
  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Onceinawhile (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Marquardtika. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Morgan & Morgan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Deckkohl (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a retaliatory post due to me posting a WP:COI notice on this this user's talk page. Marquardtika (talk) 14:46, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 23 § Current U.S. state representative redirects until a consensus is reached. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - January 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

December 2025

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Generation Progress when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Marquardtika. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theknoledgeableperson (SHOUT HERE) 18:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Marquardtika! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Question about WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Mill

[edit]

The essay title is confusing so I understandyour confusion. But it is about notability. "This page in a nutshell: There are some items that are very commonplace for which sources verifying their existence do exist. But there are so many of these that can be verified given the same sources, it would be better not to have a separate article on each and every one of them." Doug Weller talk 20:07, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Yes, WP:MILL wasn't the right thing to link. But my meaning was that the fact that a Discovery Institute staffer appeared on a t.v. show is very run of the mill, as in not particularly noteworthy. Maybe I meant more like a "laundry list". I think it comes off as promotional in organizational and individual articles when we say things like "they appeared on XYZ media outlets..." Marquardtika (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2026

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:15, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 January 2026

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:28, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2026

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia
    articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet.

Tip of the month:

  • Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Chris Hohn introduction

[edit]

Hello! We had been discussing the Chris Hohn article introduction briefly back in December. I am curious if you're still interested in working on that? I posted a shortened request on Talk:Chris Hohn. Cheers. 2012duke21 (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Dan Huberty page

[edit]

Hi there, I recently made a few edits to the Dan Huberty page, including adding a section highlighting awards he received during his time as a Texas legislator. The information was fully sourced and intended to maintain a neutral tone. Could you share why that section was removed, or offer any guidance on how it could be adjusted to better align with editing standards?

Thank you! Themach1group (talk) 16:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Themach1group: As I've posted on your talk page, I'm concerned about your WP:COI as well as your user name, which appears to imply that you are not an individual, but a group (or representative of a group?)--please see Wikipedia:Username policy and WP:SHAREDACCOUNT. Marquardtika (talk) 17:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for bringing that to my attention! I am a representative of a group but do not share this account with anyone. Could you provide guidance on how to change my username? And I believe I have already stated my COI on previous edits to Dan Huberty's page. Do I need to restate it every time I make an edit?
Thanks so much! Themach1group (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You can request to change your user name at Wikipedia:Changing username. And you need to post a COI disclosure on your user talk page per WP:DISCLOSE. Lastly, since you have a disclosed COI, you can make edit requests on the talk page via Template:Edit COI. Please also read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Marquardtika (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! I have established the COI on my user page. Appreciate the guidance! Themach1group (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marquardtika&oldid=1336410534"