User talk:Mr-Thomas

==Hi Mr Thomas. Thanks for your comments on Johann Hari's page! It might be best to post your thoughts here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-01-04_Johann_Hari where decisions are now being made on the edits...

Best wishes

David RDavid r from meth productions 16:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mr-Thomas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 19:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Description of Image:Eustonmanifestolaunch.jpg[edit]

Your edit summary "Removed for sarcasm and violating npov (unless I've missed the point?)" looks like it hit the point exactly, at least so far as I am concerned. The point the user who added "ethnically diverse" was making also seems misplaced - the panel is actually quite ethnically diverse. Fys. Ta fys aym. 14:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't normally get in arguments on talk pages or anything, and I'm quite young, so I'm a bit nervous about getting something wrong and upsetting everyone. But yeah, it seemed like an absurd and pretty transparently racist thing to say, so I got rid of it. Mr-Thomas 14:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Hari[edit]

Hi. This is a quick note about the editing of the Johann Hari page, which I know you've helpfully intervened on in the past.

As reading though the page's history will show, the user Felix-Felix has described Hari as "a self-publicising careerist, and an especially unpleasant one at that", accused him of being in favour of "the destruction of Untermenschen" (when in fact he is an Amnesty International award-winner), inserted fictitious claims he went to the most exclusive public school in Britain when in fact his father is a bus driver, and, most crucially, inserted poorly sourced claims that he "fabricated" a story he wrote about.

This is a pattern of falsehood and animus that really worries me. This user is now insisting on his right to reinsert the claims that hari farbricated a story, sourcing them to a magazine that wiki administrators have already said is not reliable. What can I do in this situation? - DavidR81.129.156.202 12:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dave r has been smearing me with these accusations, one of which is false, the other taken out of context, and utterly irrelevant. He has also posted this defamatory message on multiple other user talk pages; [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. This is starting to feel a little like harassment, and not in a good way. FelixFelix ^talk 14:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments Mr Thomas! Stick with us...David r from meth productions 12:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

On 7 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Biofortification, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 14:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppet editing[edit]

There is an open WP:SPI case looking at sockpuppet editing primarily on the Johann Hari/ Talk page. As you edited the Johann Hari/Talk page between 2004 and 2011, your input is welcomed. Yonmei (talk) 22:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mr-Thomas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Compromised account[edit]

WP:COMPROMISED. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]