Jump to content

Johann Hari

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Johann Hari
Hari in 2011
Born
Johann Eduard Hari

(1979-01-21) 21 January 1979 (age 45)
Glasgow, Scotland
Citizenship
  • United Kingdom
  • Switzerland
Alma materKing's College, Cambridge
Occupation
  • Writer
Notable workChasing the Scream
Websitejohannhari.com

Johann Eduard Hari (born 21 January 1979) is a British writer and journalist whose books include 2022's Stolen Focus, about technology and modern lifestyles' impact on attention spans and mental health, and 2015's Chasing the Scream, about addiction and the war on drugs. Both were New York Times bestsellers, and Hari’s 2015 TED Talk based on Chasing the Scream was one of the most-watched of the year.[1][2] Up until 2011, Hari wrote for The Independent, among other outlets, before resigning after admitting to plagiarism and fabrications dating back to 2001.[3]

Hari’s other books include Magic Pill, about semaglutide medications used to treat type 2 diabetes and obesity, and Lost Connections, about depression, anxiety, and related mental health conditions. He is also listed as a producer and writer on the 2021 film The United States vs. Billie Holiday, which was nominated for an Academy Award, two Golden Globes, and other awards.[4]

Early life

[edit]

Hari was born in Glasgow, Scotland, to a Scottish mother and Swiss father,[3] before his family relocated to London when he was an infant.[5] Hari states he was physically abused in his childhood while his father was away and his mother was ill.[6]

He attended the John Lyon School, an independent school affiliated with Harrow, and then Woodhouse College, a state sixth form in Finchley.[7] Hari graduated from King's College, Cambridge, in 2001 with a double first in social and political sciences.[8]

Early career

[edit]

In 2000, Hari was joint winner of The Times Student News Journalist of the Year award for his work on the Cambridge student newspaper, Varsity.

After university, he joined the New Statesman, where he worked between 2001 and 2003, and then wrote two columns a week for The Independent. At the 2003 Press Gazette Awards, he won Young Journalist of the Year.[9] A play by Hari, Going Down in History, was performed at the Garage Theatre in Edinburgh, and his book God Save the Queen? was published by Icon Books in 2002.[9]

In addition to being a columnist for The Independent, Hari's work also appeared in The Huffington Post, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The New Republic, The Nation, Le Monde, El País, The Sydney Morning Herald, and Haaretz, and he reported from locations around the world, such as Congo and Venezuela.[10] He appeared regularly as an arts critic on the BBC Two programme The Review Show and was a book critic for Slate. In 2009, he was named by The Daily Telegraph as one of the most influential people on the left in Britain.[11]

Later career

[edit]

Chasing the Scream (2015)

[edit]
Main article: Chasing the Scream

Hari’s 2015 book, Chasing the Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs, is a comprehensive critique of the global prohibition of illicit drugs, such as cocaine, heroin, and marijuana.[12][13] Through extensive research involving travels around the world and interviews with experts on all sides of the debate, Hari builds an argument that prohibition, drug laws, and the persecution of people who use drugs collectively do more harm to people and society than the drugs themselves.[14] The book also popularized the idea that “the opposite of addiction is connection,” after Hari delivered a 2015 TED Talk with that title, which became one of the nonprofit organization’s most-watched presentations of that year.[15] The idea – supported by a variety of evidence presented in Chasing the Scream – posits that illicit drug use and most addictions are not character flaws, nor are they primarily a result of genetic disorders, but rather, are functional responses to negative experiences – early childhood experiences, especially – and/or a lack of supportive relationships.

The book delves into the history of drug prohibition, tracing its roots back to early 20th-century America. Delving into the life of American jazz singer Billy Holiday as an example, Hari argues that the criminalization of drugs was often driven by racial and social biases rather than scientific evidence. He also highlights the roles of figures like Harry Anslinger, the first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, who played significant roles in shaping the application of early anti-drug laws, again rooting actions in racism as opposed to science or legitimate health policy, and Arnold Rothstein, the infamous gangster of the 1920s who took over New York's alcohol and drug markets with brutal violance.

Chasing the Scream also examines the societal consequences of the war on drugs, including mass incarceration, crime and violence, and the rise of powerful drug cartels. These policies have not only failed to reduce drug use, Hari shows, but have also created significant social and economic problems in most countries around the world.

The book proposes a radical shift in drug policy, advocating for decriminalization, harm reduction, and treatment as alternatives to punishment. It presents examples of where such policy shifts are proving effective, including Portugal and Vancouver, Canada, among others.

A mostly positive review by the San Francisco Chronicle describes Chasing the Scream as “riveting” and emphasizes the strengths of Hari’s character development and compelling narratives.[16] A positive-to-mixed review by The Guardian calls Chasing the Scream an “important and largely convincing book” and a “powerful contribution to an urgent debate,” while faulting Hari for sometimes making generalizations that are overly broad.[17] A more negative review by the New York Times argues Hari is too accepting of certain researchers’ conclusions and relies too heavily on anecdotes versus facts, but it also describes Hari’s portrayal of his protagonists – Holiday, Anslinger, Rothstein, and others – as “vivid” and powerful.”[18] A wholly positive write-up by Kirkus Reviews described Chasing the Scream as a “compassionate and humane argument to overturn draconian drug policies.”[19] On Hari’s website, Elton John calls Chasing the Scream “absolutely stunning,” Noam Chomsky describes it as “wonderful,” and Bill Maher says it is “terrific.”

Lost Connections (2018)

[edit]

Lost Connections challenges conventional understandings of depression, anxiety, and related mental health issues, arguing that these conditions are not solely caused by chemical imbalances in the brain. Instead, citing extensive research conducted for the book, Hari proposes that the root causes of depression and anxiety are often rooted in social, environmental, and psychological factors, such as access to meaningful work, proximity to friends and family, and past experiences with childhood trauma.

The book dedicates significant time to human connection, emphasizing its crucial role in mental well-being. Hari explores how modern society, characterized by superficial interactions and increasing isolation, contributes to feelings of loneliness and disconnection, and how these states relate to the more long-term conditions of depression and anxiety.

The second half of Lost Connections explores solutions to these mental health conditions, approaching them from the premise described above. Hari highlights the importance of meaningful relationships, community involvement, and a sense of purpose in combating mental illness.

Hari cites his own childhood issues, career challenges, and experiences with antidepressants and psychotherapy as fueling his curiosity in the subject.

Lost Connections suggests a more holistic approach to the treatment of depression and anxiety. While Hari emphasizes that someone who finds benefits in taking an anti-depressant medication, for example, should not stop taking them, they should also consider lifestyle changes that aim to address the underlying causes of their mental health issues, such as those social and environmental factors discussed in the book.

Kirkus Reviews published a positive review of the book.[20]

Stolen Focus (2022)

[edit]

Hari’s 2022 book, Stolen Focus: Why You Can't Pay Attention – and How to Think Deeply Again, continues with the author’s focus on mental health. The book argues that people’s declining attention spans – a premise for which Hari provides ample quantitative evidence – are not due to personal failings, but rather are the result of systemic societal forces primarily rooted in modern technology.[21]

Stolen Focus repeats the research and writing styles of Hari’s preceding books, Chasing the Scream and Lost Connections, by once again presenting in-depth research via a first-person narrative, wherein Hari meets with dozens of social scientists around the world. Hari identifies twelve factors contributing to an “attention crisis.” Among them, Stolen Focus devotes significant space to technology addictions such as social media, but also explores the increased prevalence of chronic stress, the decline of children’s exposure to outdoor play and independent exploration, and the influence of ultra-processed foods on brain functions, among others.

An underlying theme in Stolen Focus is the role that late-stage capitalism plays in affecting people’s attention spans. Hari suggests that an emphasis on profits over human well-being creates environments that constantly bombard humans, not only with stimuli, but also with demands. He criticizes the tech industry, especially, for designing products that exploit people’s emotional vulnerabilities to maximize engagement at the cost of focus. Stolen Focus also explores the impacts of sleep deprivation, stress, and the erosion of “deep work” opportunities.

Ultimately, Hari calls for collective action and the formation of “movement to reclaim our minds.” His suggestions focus on societal changes, rather than personal action, and include calling for a shorter work week, providing children with greater access to nature, and more robust regulation of the tech industry.

The book debuted at number seven on the New York Times nonfiction best-seller list for the week ending 12 February 2022.[22] Oprah Winfrey said of Stolen Focus, "This book is exactly what the world needs right now," and Hillary Clinton said it, "rings the alarm bell for what all of us must do to protect ourselves, our children and our democracies."[23]

Magic Pill (2024)

[edit]

Magic Pill: The Extraordinary Benefits and Disturbing Risks of the New Weight Loss Drugs, explores the development and rise in popularity of semaglutide medications for type 2 diabetes and obesity. The book focuses on the best-known of these medicines, Novo Nordisk’s brand-name Ozempic for diabetes and Wegovy for weight loss, but its findings are applicable to semaglutide drugs in general.

In addition to a comprehensive summary of existing research to date, Hari interviews many of the top scientists in the space. He also delivers a first-person account of his own experience taking Ozempic for more than one year.

Magic Pill concludes that there is no doubt there are profound health benefits to taking Ozempic for those who struggle with the ailments it can address. At the same time, he emphasizes that the potential risks are not yet fully understood, especially in terms of the drug’s long-term impacts.

Upon publication, The Telegraph described Magic Pill as, “A wonderfully accessible exploration of one of the most complex problems of our age.”[24] And Booklist gave it a starred review and wrote, “A terrific read for anyone curious about or considering using these remarkable medications.”[25]

Criticism of inaccuracy and misrepresentation in books

[edit]

Due to the previous scandals, Hari put the audio of some interviews conducted for Chasing the Scream online. Writer Jeremy Duns criticised instances where quotes were inaccurately transcribed or misrepresented, stating that out of a sample of dozens of clips, "in almost all cases, words in quotes had been changed or omitted without being noted, often for no apparent purpose, but in several cases to subtly change the narrative."[26][27] In a review for New Matilda, Michael Brull expressed reservations about Hari's citational practices and highlighted contradictions between the narrative in Chasing the Scream and a 2009 article by Hari.[28]

The journalist Zoe Stavri criticised Lost Connections for a lack of citations for key claims like "between 65 and 80% of people on antidepressants are depressed again within a year", reliance on the work of a single researcher, treating research on a single class of antidepressants as if it applies to all antidepressants, and conflating stress and depression.[29][30] The psychologist and science writer Stuart Ritchie criticised Hari for repeatedly stating that "between 65 and 80% of people on antidepressants are depressed again within a year" without a clear citation. He traced the source to a pop science book rather than a review of the scientific literature.[31]

Ritchie and the neuroscientist Dean Burnett both criticised Stolen Focus for failing to cite strong evidence for the existence of shrinking attention spans, as well as for presenting mainstream psychological concepts as niche ideas that Hari had discovered.[32] Writer/broadcaster Matthew Sweet investigated some of the statements in the book and found that Hari had failed to cite the primary sources for some studies, and misrepresented the results of studies that suggested multitasking could have benefits in certain conditions.[33][34] An author of one of the papers Hari cited intervened to state that he was "not happy with misrepresentation of our results".[35][36]

Magic Pill attracted criticism for inaccuracies. Writing for The Guardian, Tom Chivers criticised the use of references which did not support the book's claims, as well as scientific inaccuracies.[37] A fact check by The Daily Telegraph found six examples of "errors, outdated data and disputed claims".[38] Private Eye magazine lambasted Hari's book for what it described as false claims and dubious references.[39]

2011 plagiarism, fabrication and misconduct scandal

[edit]

Plagiarism

[edit]

In June 2011, bloggers at Deterritorial Support Group, as well as Yahoo! Ireland editor Brian Whelan, discovered that Hari had plagiarised material published in other interviews and writings by his interview subjects.[40][41][42] For example, a 2009 interview with Afghan women's rights activist Malalai Joya included quotations from her book Raising My Voice in a manner that made them appear as if spoken directly to Hari.[43] A piece entitled "How Multiculturalism Is Betraying Women" which Hari submitted when entering the Orwell Prize was plagiarised from Der Spiegel.[44]

Hari initially denied any wrongdoing, stating that the unattributed quotes were for clarification and did not present someone else's thoughts as his own.[45][46] However, he later said that his behaviour was "completely wrong" and that "when I interviewed people, I often presented things that had been said to other journalists or had been written in books as if they had been said to me, which was not truthful".[47] Hari was suspended for two months from The Independent[48][49] and in January 2012 it was announced that he was leaving the newspaper.[50]

The Media Standards Trust instructed the council of the Orwell Prize, who had given their 2008 prize to Hari, to examine the allegations.[51][52] The council concluded that "the article contained inaccuracies and conflated different parts of someone else's story" and did not meet the standards of Orwell Prize-winning journalism.[53][54] Hari returned the prize,[55] though he did not return the prize money of £2,000.[56] He later offered to repay the sum, but Political Quarterly, which had paid the prize money, instead invited him to make a donation to English PEN, of which George Orwell had been a member. Hari arranged with English PEN to make a donation equal to the value of the prize, to be paid in installments when he returned to work at The Independent, but he did not return to work there.[57]

Fabrication and misrepresentation

[edit]

In an article about military robots, Hari falsely claimed that former Japanese prime minister Junichiro Koizumi was attacked by a factory robot and was nearly killed.[58][59][60] Hari falsely claimed that a large globe erected for the Copenhagen climate summit was "covered with corporate logos" for McDonald's and Carlsberg, with "the Coke brand ... stamped over Africa."[60] Private Eye's Hackwatch column also suggested that he pretended to have used the drug ecstasy and misrepresented a two-week package tour in Iraq as a one-month research visit, in order to bolster support for the Iraq war by stating that Iraqi civilians he spoke to were in favour of an invasion, although in an earlier article[61] he had given a conflicting account stating that Iraqis were reticent about their opinions.[62]

Hari has been accused of misrepresenting writing by George Galloway, Eric Hobsbawm, Nick Cohen and Noam Chomsky.[63][60]

Malicious editing of Wikipedia

[edit]

In September 2011, Hari admitted that he had edited articles on Wikipedia about himself and journalists with whom he had had disputes. Using a sock puppet account under the name "David r from meth productions", he added false and defamatory claims to articles about journalists including Nick Cohen, Cristina Odone, Francis Wheen, Andrew Roberts, Niall Ferguson[64] and Oliver Kamm,[65] and edited the article about himself "to make him seem one of the essential writers of our times".[64]

In July 2011, Cohen wrote about the suspicious Wikipedia editing in The Spectator,[64] prompting the New Statesman journalist David Allen Green to publish a blog post collecting evidence.[66] Hari used the fake identity "David Rose" to pretend to be an editor who was qualified in environmental science, and David Allen Green noticed that an 'methuselahproductions' email address associated with the David Rose identity had also been used to post incest erotica.[67][68][69]

This led to an investigation by the Wikipedia community and "David Rose" was blocked from Wikipedia.[66] Hari published an apology in The Independent, admitting that he had been "David Rose" and writing: "I edited the entries of people I had clashed with in ways that were juvenile or malicious: I called one of them anti-Semitic and homophobic, and the other a drunk. I am mortified to have done this, because it breaches the most basic ethical rule: don't do to others what you don't want them to do to you. I apologise to the latter group unreservedly and totally."[70]

Use of libel law to suppress criticism

[edit]

Hari used threats of suing for libel to prevent critics revealing his misrepresentations.[71] British bloggers criticised his critique of Nick Cohen's What's Left: How Liberals Lost Their Way for factual and interpretive errors. Hari used libel law against a blogger who wrote that "a reputation for making things up should spell career death", leading to the blogger removing the post in question.[63]

Personal life

[edit]

Hari is gay.[72][73] In a 2002 article, he stated that he had had sex with men who were members of homophobic far-right and Islamist groups.[74]

Awards

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Books

[edit]
  • Johann Hari (2002). God Save the Queen?. Icon Books. ISBN 978-1-84046-401-6.
  • Johann Hari (2015). Chasing the Scream: The First and Last Days of the War on Drugs. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-62040-890-2.
  • Johann Hari (2018). Lost Connections: Uncovering the Real Causes of Depression – and the Unexpected Solutions. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-63286-830-5.
  • Johann Hari (2021). Stolen Focus: Why You Can't Pay Attention. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-5266-2022-4.
  • Johann Hari (2024). Magic Pill: The Extraordinary Benefits and Disturbing Risks of the New Weight Loss Drugs. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-52667015.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Stolen Focus by Johann Hari: 9780593138533 | PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books". PenguinRandomhouse.com. Retrieved 11 November 2024.
  2. ^ "The most popular talks of 2015 | TED Talks". www.ted.com. Retrieved 11 November 2024.
  3. ^ a b Aitkenhead, Decca (2 January 2015). "Johann Hari: 'I failed badly. When you harm people, you should shut up, go away and reflect on what happened'". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  4. ^ The United States vs. Billie Holiday (2021) - Awards - IMDb. Retrieved 11 November 2024 – via www.imdb.com.
  5. ^ "About the Author". Chasing The Scream. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
  6. ^ Anthony, Andrew (7 January 2018). "Johann Hari: 'I was afraid to dismantle the story about depression and anxiety'". The Observer.
  7. ^ Hari, Johann. "A simple lesson on schools: Money works". Archived from the original on 26 January 2013. Retrieved 11 July 2010.
  8. ^ Adkins, T. S.; Bulmer, N. S. D.; Jones, P. M.; Langley, H. C. (2018). A Register of Admissions to King's College Cambridge, 1934–2010. King's College Cambridge. p. 988.
  9. ^ a b Spanner, Huw (November 2004). "Let The Fiery Columns Glow". Third Way Magazine. pp. 16–19.
  10. ^ Hari, Johann (2015). Chasing The Scream. Bloomsbury USA, New York. p. 180.
  11. ^ Dale, Iain; Brivati, Brian (27 September 2009). "Top 100 most influential Left-wingers: 100-51". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 30 September 2009. Retrieved 6 May 2010.
  12. ^ Hari, Johann (20 January 2012). "Update". Johannhari.com. Archived from the original on 18 January 2016. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  13. ^ "Chasing the Scream". Bloomsbury Publishing.
  14. ^ "Johann Hari's Chasing the Scream looks to Vancouver for a start to the end of the war on drugs". The Georgia Straight. 18 July 2015. Retrieved 3 December 2024.
  15. ^ "TED talk: Everything you thought you knew about addictions is wrong". 18 January 2018.
  16. ^ Spindel, By Barbara (16 January 2015). "'Chasing the Scream,' by Johann Hari". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
  17. ^ Harris, John (9 January 2015). "Chasing the Scream by Johann Hari review – taking on the war on drugs". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
  18. ^ "'Chasing the Scream,' by Johann Hari (Published 2015)". 13 February 2015. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 15 December 2024.
  19. ^ CHASING THE SCREAM | Kirkus Reviews.
  20. ^ "Kirkus Review: Lost Connections". 23 January 2018.
  21. ^ Hari, Johann (2 January 2022). "Your attention didn't collapse. It was stolen". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  22. ^ "Combined Print & E-Book Nonfiction – Best Sellers". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 February 2022.
  23. ^ "Stolen Focus : Why You Can't Pay Attention - and How to Think Deeply Again". stolenfocusbook.com. 2 July 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2024.
  24. ^ Nuki, Paul (29 April 2024). "Why Ozempic and other weight-loss drugs are more dangerous than you think". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 30 December 2024.
  25. ^ Magic Pill: The Extraordinary Benefits and Disturbing Risks of the New Weight-Loss Drugs, by By Johann Hari. | Booklist Online.
  26. ^ "Johann Hari Is Still Lying to You". Jeremy Duns. 7 September 2014. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  27. ^ "A Short*, Frustrated Piece On Johann Hari's Quote Deceptions". Jeremy Duns. 20 January 2015. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  28. ^ "Chasing the Scream Review Part IV: My Reservations About Johann Hari". 4 March 2016.
  29. ^ "Five things wrong with Johann Hari's comeback book that I spotted from the extract alone". 8 January 2018.
  30. ^ "Thinking critically about Lost Connections 1: An introduction, of sorts". 22 January 2018.
  31. ^ @StuartJRitchie (11 January 2018). "Thread Part 2 -> Eventually, I found Hari's source! It's not a recent meta-analysis of the full literature on anti-…" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  32. ^ "Johann Hari's stolen ideas". UnHerd. 7 January 2022. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  33. ^ "Thread by @DrMatthewSweet on Thread Reader App". threadreaderapp.com. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  34. ^ Linehan, Hugh (15 January 2022). "Too few of us are paying attention to the problems with Johann Hari's new book". The Irish Times. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
  35. ^ "The strange rehabilitation of Johann Hari". www.spiked-online.com. Retrieved 9 August 2024.
  36. ^ https://x.com/lorenz_spreen/status/1479486880429355014 [bare URL]
  37. ^ Chivers, Tom (1 May 2024). "Magic Pill by Johann Hari review – weighing in". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 9 August 2024.
  38. ^ Shirreff, Lauren (29 May 2024). "We fact-checked a famous plagiarist's book on Ozempic—and uncovered a string of errors". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 9 August 2024.
  39. ^ Private Eye magazine #1624 6 June 2024 page 36 - Literary Review - "Magic Pillock"
  40. ^ Sabbagh, Dan (28 June 2011). "Johann Hari denies these accusations of plagiarism". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  41. ^ O'Neill, Brendan (29 June 2011). "Johann Hari and the tyranny of the 'good lie'". The Telegraph blog. Archived from the original on 2 July 2011. Retrieved 27 September 2011.
  42. ^ Flock, Elizabeth (28 June 2011). "Johann Hari denies he plagiarized, sparking mockery campaign". The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  43. ^ Dowell, Ben (1 July 2011). "Johann Hari: more plagiarism allegations". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 September 2011.
  44. ^ "Dirty Hari". December 2011.
  45. ^ Hari, Johann. "Interview etiquette". johannhari.com. Archived from the original on 30 June 2011. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  46. ^ Hari, Johann (29 June 2011). "Johann Hari: My journalism is at the centre of a storm. This is what I have learned". The Independent. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
  47. ^ Anthony, Andrew (7 January 2018). "Johann Hari: 'I was afraid to dismantle the story about depression and anxiety'". the Guardian. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
  48. ^ McAthy, Rachel (12 July 2011). "Orwell Prize Council begins investigation into Johann Hari|Johann Hari suspended for two months pending investigation". journalism.co.uk. Mousetrap Media.
  49. ^ Deans, Jason (13 July 2011). "Journalist suspended over plagiarism row". The Guardian. p. 10. Retrieved 13 July 2011.
  50. ^ "Johann Hari leaves the Independent after plagiarism storm". TheGuardian.com. 20 January 2012.
  51. ^ Gunter, Joel (30 June 2011). "Orwell Prize Council begins investigation into Johann Hari". journalism.co.uk. Mousetrap Media.
  52. ^ "Media Standards Trust response to Johann Hari allegations" (Press release). Media Standards Trust. 28 June 2011. Archived from the original on 1 July 2011. Retrieved 28 June 2011.
  53. ^ "Johann Hari did not deserve Orwell Prize, say organisers". Politics.co.uk. 27 September 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  54. ^ "Orwell Prize accuses Johann Hari of plagiarism". the Guardian. 27 September 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  55. ^ "The Orwell Prize and Johann Hari". 28 September 2011.
  56. ^ Pugh, Andrew (27 September 2011). "Johann Hari yet to return Orwell prize £2,000". Press Gazette. Archived from the original on 2 March 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2017.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  57. ^ "The Orwell Prize and Johann Hari – English PEN". 4 October 2011.
  58. ^ "Johann Hari: The age of the killer robot is no longer a sci-fi fantasy". Independent.co.uk. 22 January 2010.
  59. ^ "Commentary on Killer Robots is Mostly Bunk". 26 January 2010.
  60. ^ a b c "Dirty Hari". December 2011.
  61. ^ Hari, Johann (3 December 2002). "The mother of all package tours". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
  62. ^ "Hari's Game". Private Eye. No. 1076. 23 March 2003. p. 5. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  63. ^ a b Michael Weiss. "Bloggers defy Britain's tough libel laws". Slate Magazine. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  64. ^ a b c Cohen, Nick (9 July 2011). "Diary". The Spectator. London. Archived from the original on 4 August 2011. Retrieved 28 July 2011.
  65. ^ Thompson, Damian (11 July 2011). "The scandal that will not go away". The Daily Telegraph blog. Archived from the original on 25 August 2011.
  66. ^ a b Allen Green, David (15 September 2011). "The tale of Mr Hari and Dr Rose". New Statesman. Retrieved 22 September 2011.
  67. ^ "Archive.ph". 8 June 2021. Archived from the original on 9 January 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  68. ^ ""What's in a name? That which we call a Rose."". 10 July 2011.
  69. ^ https://www.nifty.org/nifty/gay/incest/little-brother-learned-to-be-a-whore [bare URL]
  70. ^ Hari, Johann (14 September 2011). "A personal apology". The Independent.
  71. ^ "The tale of Mr Hari and Dr Rose". New Statesman. 8 June 2021. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  72. ^ Haldane, J. (2012). Against erotic entitlements. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life, (222), 19-21.
  73. ^ Hari, Johann (1 March 2015). "Has being gay influenced my view of the war on drugs?". OpenDemocracy. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  74. ^ Hari, Johann (13 December 2002). "Sleeping with the enemy". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  75. ^ Morris, Sally (15 June 2000). "Future Perfect". The Times. London.
  76. ^ "British Press Awards: Past Winners". Press Gazette. Archived from the original on 20 March 2012. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  77. ^ a b "Johann Hari". BBC News. 5 May 2006. Retrieved 6 May 2010.
  78. ^ "The dark side of Dubai". Independent.co.uk. 7 April 2009. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
  79. ^ "Winners announced for Environmental Press Awards". Press Gazette. London. 26 November 2008. Archived from the original on 16 June 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  80. ^ "Independent journalist wins Stonewall award". The Independent. London. 7 November 2009. Retrieved 7 November 2009.
  81. ^ "AIUK Media Awards: Winners and Nominees 2010". Amnesty International UK. Archived from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  82. ^ "Congo's tragedy: the war the world forgot". Independent.co.uk. 5 May 2006. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
  83. ^ "Johann Hari picks up Martha Gellhorn Prize". Press Gazette blog. London. 24 May 2010. Archived from the original on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 2 July 2010.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Johann Hari.
Wikiquote has quotations related to Johann Hari.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johann_Hari&oldid=1266226216"