User talk:Mr. Deer

Don't swear/curse/cuss/etc. on my talk page.

I don't care how many unblock requests you see on this page, I AM NOT A SOCKPUPPET!!!

Welcome![edit]

Hi Mr. Deer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Mr. Deer (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ha lol Mr. Deer (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yeet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Largoplazo (talk) 02:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My block[edit]

@Mz7: Who is this User:WinnerWolf99 fellow? Mr. Deer (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January '21[edit]

@WinnerWolf99 and Mz7: Thank you. Mr. Deer (talk) 03:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Deer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sock of anyone, what does CheckUser actually check? Mr. Deer (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also remembered that, last I checked, CheckUsers are not supposed to go 'fishing' like [this diff] shows. Also, I had no time to defend myself at all. Mr. Deer (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Deer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No answers given to any of my questions, requesting re-checkuser, and don't edit my signatures/links. Mr. Deer (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 3[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Deer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or The only thing I've "done wrong" is somehow be linked to another user(and by the way, I don't really care about LGBTQ+ either way).
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for, being somehow linked to another user
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I never did anything damaging or disruptive
3. will make useful contributions instead. Which I have been doing. Mr. Deer (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, User talk:WinnerWolf99#January '21 and User talk:Some test both indicate that I am not a sockpuppet, while Some test is. Why would they dispatch one account and let me live if I was their sockpuppet? Mr. Deer (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Side note, my 100th edit was AN UNBLOCK REQUEST!! Mr. Deer (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 4[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Deer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No answers given to any of my questions, requesting re-checkuser, and don't edit my signatures/links. Mr. Deer (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 5[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Deer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or The only thing I've "done wrong" is somehow be linked to another user(and by the way, I don't really care about LGBTQ+ either way).

   the block is no longer necessary because you
       understand what you have been blocked for, being somehow linked to another user
       will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I never did anything damaging or disruptive
       will make useful contributions instead. Which I have been doing. Mr. Deer (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Furthermore, User talk:WinnerWolf99#January '21 and User talk:Some test both indicate that I am not a sockpuppet, while Some test is. Why would they dispatch one account and let me live if I was their sockpuppet? Mr. Deer (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Side note, my 100th edit was AN UNBLOCK REQUEST!! Mr. Deer (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Please don't give a "confirmed sockpuppetry" response, I am innocent([e]). Mr. Deer (talk) 19:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A formality now that talk page access has been revoked. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As there have been multiple unblock requests, and as the checkuser findings are verified by me and others, I am removing talk page access. We should have done this after the third and fourth requests. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

temporary sandbox[edit]

Confirmed Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) Unrelated Possible Comment: Likely Clerk note: Clerk assistance requested: Global lock(s) requested Stale CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk