User talk:MrFalala

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of HarveyCarter (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, MrFalala, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for The Blitz. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DBaK (talk) 15:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, MrFalala. You have new messages at Talk:The Blitz.
Message added 15:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBaK (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Scottish independence referendum, 2014

Please desist from using Wikipedia as a soapbox for your opinions. There are plenty of other sites that specialise in that sort of thing. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not opinions - facts. (MrFalala (talk) 14:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Very well, I have therefore referred you to the administrator noticeboard. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:54, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Talk:The Blitz. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Irish War of Independence, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 17:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Irish War of Independence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Banner talk 18:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Free State was NOT independent, which is why the IRA fought a civil war. Even Michael Collins admitted the Treaty did not mean independence. (MrFalala (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bengal famine of 1943 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Banner talk 20:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ----Snowded ^TALK 13:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've now blocked this account indefinitely since it was apparent you were not here to improve the encyclopedia. --John (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]