User talk:Mr Beale

A welcome from Sango123

Hello, Mr Beale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Simplified Ruleset
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Libby/Cheney, etc

You wrote, in multiple places, that Libby testified today (Feb 9) about Cheney. But that's not accurate. There was no testimony today. What happened, the best I understand it, is that the National Journal, on Feb 9, first broke the story that in papers filed by Fitzgerald in Jan, "he had been authorized to divulge portions of a then-still highly classified National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear weapons," and that "Beyond what was stated in the court paper, say people with firsthand knowledge of the matter, Libby also indicated what he will offer as a broad defense during his upcoming criminal trial: that Vice President Cheney and other senior Bush administration officials had earlier encouraged and authorized him to share classified information with journalists to build public support for going to war. Later, after the war began in 2003, Cheney authorized Libby to release additional classified information, including details of the NIE, to defend the administration's use of prewar intelligence in making the case for war." [1]. So, I think you need to correct the places where you put it a bit. Thanks! -- Sholom 03:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikistalking by Lolababy

Almost every article that Lolababy has edited has been an article you have edited. I am trying to clean up the mess he caused. Have you gotten into any disputes lately? Captainktainer * Talk 14:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He pretty much started editing on IMDB, so that might explain it. Bah... craziness. Captainktainer * Talk 20:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gone

User talk:Milesplot. Damn, that was annoying. Mango juice^talk 21:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tomato

Thanks for trying to help, but please don't recreate pages when a vandal moves them. It is known as a copy paste move, and the history will be lost if you do. It's better to let the admins get on with moving it back. Cheers. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 21:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 19:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bob Geiger

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bob Geiger, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bob Geiger seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bob Geiger, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 19:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mark Fox (singer)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Fox (singer), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Fox (singer). Thank you. - Pocopocopocopoco 00:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

double entendre

Re yr edit to Robert Wexler#Colbert Report interview, i've tagged it w/ {{fact}}. If it's that obvious, it's an opportunity to show magnanimity.
--Jerzy•t 05:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jonathan Tasini

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jonathan Tasini, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Tasini. Thank you. MrPrada (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

I've nominated Obama Republican and McCain Democrat for deletion. Northwestgnome (talk) 18:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Schlund

The decision to delete the article Dan Schlund is now being reviewed. You have been sent this message because you have previously been involved in the AfD discussion(s) concerning this article. If you are interested in the review discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 April 3. Thank you. Esasus (talk) 15:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2010 United States Senate elections.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2010 United States Senate elections.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mo Cowan

On 9 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mo Cowan, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the appointment of Mo Cowan (pictured) to the U.S. Senate marks the first time two African Americans served concurrently? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mo Cowan. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Massachusetts liberal, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Massachusetts liberal" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mr Beale. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mr Beale. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]