User talk:Mrgr8shag
This article seems very light on information. Just wondering if anyone is planning to add more info in regards to majors won and maybe who her competitors were.
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Mrgr8shag! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 659 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Patrick Larkin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:19, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jackiechan
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jackiechan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Phileasson (talk) 14:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Songs
[edit]Please note that under Wikipedia's notability rules for songs, not every song that exists is automatically entitled to its own separate Wikipedia article. Rather, you need to cite at least one actual reliable source (preferably more if at all possible) which actually verifies the notability claim (chart position, etc.), or else the article can be redirected to the band or the album it's on at any time. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 22:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Find Another Fool
[edit]Hello Mrgr8shag,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Find Another Fool for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fevrret (talk) 01:19, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Patrick Larkin (novelist) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Larkin (novelist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.