User talk:Mrzaius

This user may have left Wikipedia. Mrzaius has not edited Wikipedia since 16 July 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Just a heads up - If you leave a message, I respond here about as oft as not. I'm not quite so busy here anymore, but I'll get back soon enough.


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #49

Redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address one or more redirects you have created. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mrzaius (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption: I live in Kosovo where all residential ISPs and all networks I access at work masquerade behind relatively small IP ranges, most of which have been blocked on at least one occasion. (Ran up against one this morning from the new Android app that wouldn't even tell me why or give an expiry date. Getting frustrating.) Block exemption would be much appreciated, if possible. MrZaius^talk 09:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as we're really not supposed to give out IPBE this way anymore. Go to WP:IPBE and use the OTRS interface there. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The recent change you re-did on the Presidents that have Served

The reason I had put that is because if you actually read up on it, you will find out that George W Bush didn't serve in the war. His dad George H.W. Bush had put him into college therefore he didnt serve

Language like "Desserter (Fled to Canada) His daddy had money so they allowed it" was clear vandalism and clearly warranted the revert. The more ambiguous edit this morning still warranted reversion. (Although I probably shouldn't have used popups to do it.) The original deleted language is still much more in keeping with the style of the rest of the piece. If you can find a way to introduce criticism without a clear bias/while maintaining an encyclopedic tone without removing easily verifiable content (i.e. by linking to something like this), go for it. MrZaius^talk 09:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propriety listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Propriety. Since you had some involvement with the Propriety redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 06:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Mrzaius,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spacing

Template:Spacing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American Model United Nations

Hello Mrzaius,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged American Model United Nations for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Devopam (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Electability listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Electability. Since you had some involvement with the Electability redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

history

can I have a example of ratification — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C580:B9A0:89D8:6DC6:B52E:AA3B (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Lego Star Wars sets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Lego Star Wars sets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lego Star Wars sets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 08:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Distributed republic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Distributed republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distributed republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeŻet (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of nuclear holocaust fiction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of nuclear holocaust fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of nuclear holocaust fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcome-unconstructive

Template:Welcome-unconstructive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. #prodraxis ^connect 14:06, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]