User talk:Mtj456

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mtj456, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

March 2020[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Versions of Justice League, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 16:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Versions of Justice League, you may be blocked from editing. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Versions of Justice League. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Jorm (talk) 18:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. JOE BRO 64 12:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I did give a valid point u troll. IGN.com is not a reliable source srop misleading the public. The only official word on additional photography has been given by Zack who teased there would be. When and where exactly we don’t know yet. Mtj456 (talk) 13:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Zack Snyder's Justice League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JOE BRO 64 11:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Zack Snyder's Justice League. JOE BRO 64 12:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not doing that on purpose. I’m trying to cite it but I’m having technical issues in doing so. Perhaps you can do That for me? Mtj456 (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you’re having a hard time, that’s understandable, but it still doesn’t give you free reign to repeatedly revert and undo changes. If you don’t know how to edit yet, please lay out your intentions on the article talk page, and editors can help you implement it if it’s deemed appropriate. Sergecross73 msg me 14:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mtj456! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at DC Extended Universe‎ that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok thank you for the clarification! Mtj456 (talk) 21:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Prophets and messengers in Islam. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 03:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]