User talk:Mufasa19995

Mufasa19995, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mufasa19995! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deo Raj (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deo Raj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deo Raj, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Bro, you can create Deo Raj article yourself, you don't need it to be reviewed.146.199.86.244 (talk) 13:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How bro? Mufasa19995 (talk) 12:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deo Raj (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from indianrajputs.com/view/deo. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Deo Raj may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GHURIDS.

The origin of ghurids are doubted( either pashtun or tajik as per wiki) so it should be on both articles but with a "debated". That would fit the wiki standards.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4643:C8EC:0:2088:C20D:2540:8E08 (talk) 12:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page usage

Since you are engaging in talk page discussions, please review HELP:TALK for a quick intro to how to indent and sign talk posts. HELP:Talk pages gives more detail.

This post was a bit disorganised, and I am going to clean it up a bit. Please watch what I do so that you can follow in future. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:13, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the edit that did the reformatting. I added enough ":" symbols to get the right indentation, enclosed all URL's in [] square brackets, and added your signature. You should always use the PREVIEW button to check that your post looks right. You will only be able to get your points across if your posts are clear and clean. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:26, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing at History of India

A few notes in reply to your recent post at the article talkpage. Placing it here so that the discussion on that talkpage can remain focused on the article content and not editor conduct:

One doesn't need to have perfect English to edit wikipedia but when in doubt discuss/get help on the article talkpage and polish the text before adding it to the article. Also taking a bit of time to compose and format your talkpage posts (as you have been told before) would help.
As for sources: Taylor's 1902 book, Vincent Smith's 1920 book, Raya's 1939 book, and Ian Austin's obscure book, among others, are not good enough sources, especially for this top-level page. See WP:HISTRS for the type of sources that are desired.
Thirdly, copying text between wikipedia articles without proper attribution is a copyright violation; see WP:COPYWITHIN.
Also when copying make sure to update the formatting of the copied references to match the existing style on the target page. In particular you copied citations to "Peter Jackson 2003, p. 9.", "Cynthia Talbot 2015, p. 33." etc without adding the needed information about what exact source those shortened footnotes refer to. See WP:SRF for details.
Finally, you should be aware of wikipedia's policies on sock- and meat-puppetry.

Given the number of issues with your recent contributions, I would suggest slowing down on the talkpage and, definitely, not to edit-war to get your preferred content included in the article. If you have questions about the issues I mentioned above feel free to ask here or at WP:TEAHOUSE. Abecedare (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia : FYI only

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Thanks for your contributions to wikipedia.LukeEmily (talk) 11:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Here you removed the sourced quote with pretext of adding more information [1] Heba Aisha (talk) 00:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]