User talk:Musicman5

Welcome

Hello, Musicman5, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 07:02, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Press_shot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Press_shot.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:HEAD_SHOT.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HEAD_SHOT.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alex Nackman Gans2.jpg

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 00:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Alex Nackman Gans2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Alex Nackman Gans2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 13:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Alex Nackman

I have nominated Alex Nackman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Nackman (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Long Road Records

The article Long Road Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable record label

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Nackman (2nd nomination)

Hi,

Although I was the one who nominated the Alex Nackman article for deletion its fate was decided by community consensus, as interpreted by the closing admin, User:Cirt. If you wish to have the article looked at again you can either leave a message on Cirts talkpage or take it up at a deletion review. The main concerns I had with the article were the question mark over his notability and the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that were independent of the subject. If you aren't familiar with the standards we need at Wikipedia, then the guidelines to look at would be:- Wikipedia:Music#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Secondary_source#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources. Cheers. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest at article Alex Nackman

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Alex Nackman, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]