User talk:MystifiedCitizen

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 12:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coherent catastrophe

I've reverted your edits at Göbekli Tepe - see the discussion at Talk:Göbekli Tepe and join it if you think your edit should stand. I've also started a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#New_Coherent_catastrophism. Please note that your quote in your new article is a copyright violation (by our policy) and is about twice as long as it should be. If you don't fix this I'll have to. Doug Weller talk 12:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've chopped the loong quote -- summarize rather than copy-pasting such a long quote. Vsmith (talk) 12:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We don't accuse authors of character assassination or make unsourced claims that X supports Y

Please understand that our personal opinions should never be added to articles. See WP:VERIFY and WP:RS. This applies both to your comment about character assassination and stating in Wikipedia's voice that certain evidence supports a particular hypothesis. Statements like that always need sources saying that specifically. Doug Weller talk 12:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YD impact hypothesis - are you going to replace the material you thought was in the wrong section

Your edit suggested you were moving it. Instead you deleted it without moving it. Given your comments on alleged censorship I hope this was just an oversight. Doug Weller talk 16:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doug - apologies, I meant to move it not delete. I'll reverse that edit and move it instead.

Nomination of Coherent catastrophism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coherent catastrophism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coherent catastrophism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MystifiedCitizen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MystifiedCitizen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Afd

I see you've deleted some of your comments about me there. However, you did that after someone responded to you making their response confusing. Our guideline on this is at WP:REDACT: So long as no one has yet responded to your comment, it's accepted and common practice that you may continue to edit your remarks for a short while to correct mistakes, add links or otherwise improve them. If you've accidentally posted to the wrong page or section or if you've simply changed your mind, it's been only a short while and no one has yet responded, you may remove your comment entirely.

But if anyone has already replied to or quoted your original comment, changing your comment may deprive any replies of their original context, and this should be avoided. Once others have replied, or even if no one's replied but it's been more than a short while, if you wish to change or delete your comment, it is commonly best practice to indicate your changes.

Any deleted text should be marked with <s>...</s> or <del>...</del>, which renders in most browsers as struck-through text, e.g., ~~deleted~~.
Any inserted text should marked with <u>...</u> or <ins>...</ins>, which renders in most browsers as underlined text, e.g., inserted.
Best practice is to add a new timestamp, e.g., ; edited ~~~~~, using five tildes, after the original timestamp at the end of your post.
To add an explanation of your change, you may add a new comment immediately below your original or elsewhere in discussion as may be most appropriate, insert a comment in square brackets, e.g., "the default width is ~~100px~~ 120px [the default changed last month]", or use [[WP:CURRENTSECTION#New section|<sup>[corrected]</sup>]] to insert a superscript note, e.g., ^[corrected], linking to a later subsection for a detailed explanation.

In other words, you should revert yourself restoring the text, and then surround the parts you had deleted with the suggested code. I usually use <s>text you no longer feel appropriate</s>. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coherent catastrophism

I am notifying everyone who took part in the first AfD about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coherent catastrophism (2nd nomination). Doug Weller talk 12:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FireDrake. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]