User talk:Naaaina

January 2022

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ziddi Dil Maane Na, you may be blocked from editing. Stop spreading fan edits and do not spread misinformation!!! Natureisablessing (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kunal Karan Kapoor. Adakiko (talk) 07:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ziddi Dil Maane Na and Kunal Karan Kapoor. Natureisablessing (talk) 12:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Your recent editing history at Kunal Karan Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You actually broke 3RR. Next time you'll be reported. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Naaaina reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warned for edit warring at Kunal Karan Kapoor against the WP:MOS

Hello Naaaina. You've been warned as the result of a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. The next time you make a style revert (such as capitalizing 'Main Lead Role' against the recommendation of the WP:Manual of style, without first getting a consensus for your change on the talk page, you may be blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing the same kinds of disruptive editing that led to earlier blocks, including returning to repeat over and over again exactly the same edit-warring edits as before. Since neither warnings nor short blocks have had any effect on your editing, this time the block is indefinite. You may be unblocked only if you can persuade an administrator that from now on you will comply with Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 10:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #59635

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]