User talk:Nabilus junius

Anti-Arabism in Algeria

I want to inform you that I reported our dispute to the Ethnic and cultural conflicts noticeboard under the title Anti-Arabism in Algeria. You can add your opinions and views to a wider community there over our dispute to rich a consensus on the topic. Bestofmed (talk) 17:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Note

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Talk:Anti-Arabism in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.

This edit might not be comprehensible to all readers. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 18:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid personal abuse when discussing an article

You said in your discussion about Anti-Arabism in Algeria that there is no personal attacks in your answers. I advise you to read the Wikipedia Personal abuse page which clearly states that diverging from discussing the content to discussing the users themselves is considered a Personal attack. Finally, I want to apologize for my remarks about the spelling errors but I meant another thing (I wanted to be sure that you understood my concerns). Anyway, sorry again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bestofmed (talk • contribs) 00:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Racist remarks

I want to express my disappointment with some racist remarks you put in your discussion of Anti-Arabism in Algeria where you stated in French: ..Il est interessant de voire comment les arabes vivants en europe savent user des failles de la démocratie chrétienne pour imposer leur lois... While may be your intentions are not racist, these remarks are nothing but hostile and harsh in my opinion (portraying a whole people like this is not objective at all).Bestofmed (talk) 00:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Okay

Your point is noted and recieved but please note that your message bordered WP:NPA, the edit was executed with huggle which sadly provides no context for the edit (and I was in an hurry), so why all this agressive tone? Gsmgm (talk) 13:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kabyle people

Please discuss any controversial changes you want to make to the Kabyle people article on the article's talk page first. Thanks. Obiara (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Kabyle people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All you've been doing for the last 6 months or so is revert other people, with zero talk page edits. if this pattern resumes when your block expires, I will reblock for longer. Edit warring is unacceptable.

FYI, note I have blocked Dzlinker for a week because of the combination of edit warring and personal attacks. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

question

About your undo here. Can i ask why is it offensive? Dzlinker (talk) 22:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think seriously that an image of a bearded man with a disturbing facies is representative of a whole people? In general, paintings aren't adequate images for introduction representation in peoples's articles (even less a 19th century's "orientalist" painting, with all that this artistic style carries ideologically as racist prejudged towards North African populations) Nabilus junius (talk) 07:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reminder

You started a talk here that is still going on. Talk will get us to a consensus. Regards Dzlinker (talk) 20:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

relevent source claim

I know it is not relevant in some issues, but i think that in religion matters it is very relevant, since it's there main purpose! so if they say that 2% of Kabyles are "reached" then so it is. And sources about the exact number of christians are totally inexistant! What do you think? Should we use it for now and keep looking for other sources meanwhile or just let the numbers without sources! the first claim seems ok for me Dzlinker (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning you are engaged in original research & Vandalism

in well-sourced material : if you use it out of context, or to advance a position not directly and explicitly supported by the source, you are engaging in original research (According to Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines) .Tommy symbol (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Kabyle people, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. work on article tp before any further edit Dzlinker (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, we need discussion and sources before ADDING new assertions. If you continue to try to impose personal PoV without any contribution I am going to be obliged to appeal to an admin to block you (once again!!). Please let us avoid this and try to exchange in good terms and as serious persons. Nabilus junius (talk) 08:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

saḥa xo

Hi!

Could you please write this "Tagduda Tadzayrit Tamagdayt Taɣerfant" in tiffinagh to put in the Algeria article. Thanks. Dzlinker \,,/(*_*)\,,/ 22:01, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kabyle people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French and Kabyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nabilus junius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nabilus junius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nabilus junius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]