User talk:Nastya1811

Welcome!

Hello, Nastya1811!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molfar (company) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Neutral point of view issues are partly to do with the tone, partly with the structure/content, and partly with the heavy reliance on the company's own website as a source. Independent and secondary sources are necessary, both to show notability for the company, and to attribute descriptors such as "criminal" and "lie" – Wikipedia can't say those things in its own voice, but if reliable sources that are independent and secondary use such terms, Wikipedia can report on that. The draft is also imbalanced, with almost no information about the company activities in 2014-2022, and a lot of detail (and an unnecessary number of references) about what they have done since 24 February this year. It looks like there has been more about them in the press since the war started, and so it's reasonable to include more info about that time, but the level of detail here is a bit undue.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Molfar (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nastya1811! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molfar (company) has been accepted

Molfar (company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:08, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you help me with this article? I have no affiliation with this company, their team members, or their activities. What exactly needs to be changed in the text of the article? Nastya1811 (talk) 12:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello Nastya1811. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Molfar (company), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nastya1811. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nastya1811|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Nastya1811 (talk) 09:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was not paid for this article, but I had no such motives Nastya1811 (talk) 11:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:Molfar (company). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. This goes for AfC templates also. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My article was accepted and then thrown back into the draft. After that, how to throw it to the draft, it was assigned a different number and the article must again wait 4 months for moderation? Nastya1811 (talk) 10:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why it was moved back to drafts is that it has been suggested you may have a COI which you had not disclosed. Be that as it may, my point was that you must not tamper with maintenance or AfC templates; they are there for a reason. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly which part of "must not tamper with templates" are you struggling with?! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok. thanks Nastya1811 (talk) 11:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how can i remove this problem? this is not a paid post. And they did it wrong Nastya1811 (talk) 11:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "they", and what did they do wrong? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

administrators who added my article back to draft Nastya1811 (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, it isn't your article. Nobody "owns" the articles they create or edit.

Secondly, it wasn't moved by an admin, but by a reviewer (just for the record).

Thirdly and more to the point, the reason it was moved was because a COI query had been made, which you hadn't responded to, and there was reason to think a COI may exist.

Regarding that last one, from what I can see you've so far only stated that you aren't paid to create this article, but paid editing is just one specific type of COI, and you can have other types of COI even if you're not paid, for example if you know the subject personally. So that we can get to the bottom of this, can you please provide full details of any connection you may have with the company in question, the people associated with it, etc.? Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Ukraine. Currently, this company is very well known here because it covers the events of the Russian-Ukrainian war and helps Ukrainian intelligence and the government.

This company has a large staff of volunteers who want to help them.

And since I also live in Ukraine, in my opinion their activity is very useful and important in our time and for Ukraine Nastya1811 (talk) 12:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's as may be, but none of that answers my question about any connection you may have with this company. Please address that point clearly and specifically. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know about the existence of this company, I know about its activities from mass media and company pages. But I am not familiar with the owner personally, nor with the members of the company's team. I just like their work and I think it is important Nastya1811 (talk) 14:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you help me with COI? Nastya1811 (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Molfar (company) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theroadislong (talk) 14:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I need to edit the article to get it accepted. I cannot edit the text much, because the company's activities are facts. I will not change these facts. I can only change the words that describe this activity. Revert my edit please Nastya1811 (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Molfar (company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Molfar (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you help me with this article? I have no affiliation with this company, their team members, or their activities. What exactly needs to be changed in the text of the article? Nastya1811 (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molfar (company) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Molfar (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molfar (company) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dudhhr were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Molfar (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 19:18, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molfar (company) (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There were only three references added since last decline and I also see no improvement on the tone. In addition, I would advise NOT to keep sending this to the mainspace yet again based on the discussion on your talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Molfar (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 23:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Molfar (company)

Hello, Nastya1811. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Molfar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]