User talk:Nathanyanks3

Times on Base

I understand you're confused, but let me help you on this. IBB and BB are not separated. When someone is intentionally walked, it counts towards there walk total, and it is not something that is added in separately. I hope this can clear things up, because if you continue edit warring I'll have to ask for assistance for mods in ending this situation. Taffe316 (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be right, my bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanyanks3 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bermuda Hundred

You seem to believe that I have some agenda regarding this page. That's not correct. What you call "your invective" is longstanding pre-existing page content. I reverted the deletion because I think the content is perfectly appropriate here, and because I thought the deletion edit summaries were neither informative nor sufficient.

I don't feel strongly enough about this to edit-war over it. In the future, though, may I suggest that if another editor undoes your contributions, you discuss the matter, instead of just restoring your preferred version? An edit summary that begins "I don't know what your pursuing here" isn't conducive to collaboration. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mordecai Kurz

Hello, Nathanyanks3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Mordecai Kurz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please note that in accordance to our conflict of interest editing guidelines, I have moved your article to Draft:Mordecai Kurz, as editors with a conflict of interest should not create articles straight onto the mainspace. When you are ready to submit the draft for review by our Articles for Creation reviewers, please do so by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. Thank you. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mordecai Kurz (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

would benefit from independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mordecai Kurz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mordecai Kurz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nathanyanks3! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]