User talk:Nawafalslaeh

Welcome!

Hi Nawafalslaeh! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 13:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man I help you for those spammers who can tease me with it so thank man I know ya and after all so I dream of horses Nawafalslaeh (talk) 13:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daffy Duck. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 22:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do Nawafalslaeh (talk) 22:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Speedy Gonzales (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EdwardUK (talk) 23:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Crowing Pains, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 18:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chip 'n' Dale. —C.Fred (talk) 14:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry I’m apologized I have no longer vandalising chip n dale I apologized because the rumors told that their originally Nawafalslaeh (talk) 16:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation for your conduct makes no sense. Why did you remove a short from the table of their appearances? —C.Fred (talk) 21:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 12:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry for editing many things bro I’m sorry of how I did that though I’m sorry for letting me do that I let it just a correct thing to do

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nawafalslaeh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For being ruining books

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In the warning that don’t be editing stiff Nawafalslaeh (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 18:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nawafalslaeh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorry Nawafalslaeh (talk) 23:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, too, but that's not a reason to be unblocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nawafalslaeh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorryNawafalslaeh (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access removed. 331dot (talk) 11:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]