User talk:Nebraskafan08

This user may have left Wikipedia. Nebraskafan08 has not edited Wikipedia since 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello Nebraskafan08! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Building consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Johntex\^talk 21:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of East Campus Bowling Lanes, Lincoln

A tag has been placed on East Campus Bowling Lanes, Lincoln requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Porturology (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of March of the Cornhuskers

A tag has been placed on March of the Cornhuskers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 16:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of March of the Cornhuskers

I have nominated March of the Cornhuskers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March of the Cornhuskers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pontificalibus (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Game series pages

Regarding the new pages you created and then linked from Template:NebraskaCornhuskersFootballNavbox, I think you're opening a real can of worms here.... I don't think every series played on future schedules is noteworthy enough on its own to warrant an article. Once you start, where do you stop? Is an article on every recurring series in every league worth having? What about the NFL past, present and future? What about regularly-scheduled non-con games? What about historic series? If we had made these articles for the old Big 12 series now drawing to a close, what do you do with them now that they are over? This just opens up a bunch of questions that you might want to try to figure out before going too far. Also, on the template reorganization that I did a week or so ago, I deliberately changed all of the groupings to single-word titles; "Big 10 Opponents" does not fit that model. I am not going to change your work, but others might. Just some thoughts for you to consider. Fjbfour (talk) 02:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the outcome of the deletion proposals below, I have decided to go ahead and propose deletion of the remaining series pages you had created and linked to from the Nebraska football template. I hope you'll understand that creating those pages creates precedent for thousands of series pages across professional and amateur sports of all types, which would be totally unmanageable. Fjbfour (talk) 01:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nebraska-Ohio State football series

The article Nebraska-Ohio State football series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article chronicling a nonexistent rivalry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.