User talk:Neeraj5454

June 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Yes, Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include but are not limited to, links to personal websites. But the best search platform is Wikipedia, which provides all the information 100% right.

My link was correct, as per the information. Please click on my link: https://my-free-information.com/apple-pie-recipe/ Neeraj5454 (talk) 20:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. HansVonStuttgart (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry Neeraj5454 (talk) 20:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 21:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry sir this is a old aritical updated

give me one chance Neeraj5454 (talk) 21:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pless unblocked indefinitely, please, sir my humbal request for you Neeraj5454 (talk) 21:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pless sir Neeraj5454 (talk) 21:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll need to demonstrate that you understand why links like the one you mentioned above are unacceptable, and what are acceptable sources per WP:Reliable sources, before there's any chance of you being unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I did not know about this and I started updating it, which is the first update. Please forgive me. Neeraj5454 (talk) 21:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I would like to ask you something

I can add any link here which is appropriate for the article.

For this reason I need your approval. Neeraj5454 (talk) 21:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The links are inappropriate. You kept adding inappropriate links, and that's why you are blocked. For an unblock to be considered, you must demonstrate that you understand WP:SPAM, WP:EL, and WP:RS, and why the links you added violate all three of those policies. —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't we just add the link?

Why can't we add the link to the article whose link is needed?

Do the post as others like it Neeraj5454 (talk) 21:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, you have blocked me. What did I do wrong? I asked for the link. Once again, sir, can you check my link or tell me what is wrong with my link.

He wrote in our article about mashed potatoes or he will be found there.

Sir, please check that link once. Neeraj5454 (talk) 21:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WE? Wikipedia accounts are not to be shared. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]