This talkpage design was created by Phadriel. She is one of the kindest people around and is completely wonderful!
Welcome!
Hello, NeoNerd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --AbsolutDan(talk)15:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Look neonerd. I am currently working on the Engleby novel article so can you get off my back. Check out the work I have done to see how it will turn out. So, can you please get off my back? Ivankinsman 10:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
I took the liberty of moving it to the talk page of that user, where all other such comments are located. Hope you don't mind (some people are very touchy about their comments). Maurog11:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You recently edited my deletion of a redirect in the article Ailanthus altissima. I was just about to change it back myself, so thanks. Anyways, I'm not so great with some of the more techincal aspects of Wikipedia, so I'd like to ask how one would go about moving the article Tree of heaven to Ailanthus altissima. I tried it, but since the latter already existed it wouldn't let me. I thought deleting the redirect would help, but I was wrong. I've requested the move be done by an admin, but do you know of any way to do it by other means? Thanks! Djlayton4 | talk | contribs13:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I lived in Fife for a year - I miss it there!
Thanks for that job of cleaning up my user page. I've blocked the offender. No constructive edits were forthcoming... Cheers. -- Longhair\talk12:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I noticed that you reverted my reversion of the horcrux article, specifically including the widely known theories regarding RAB being Regulus Black and leaving the real locket at his home, and Harry or Harry's scar being a horcrux. What was your reasoning for this reversion? OR means something invented by a contributor. It does not mean information already printed and published by others. Similarly, 'crystal ball speculation' refers to future events. All this 'speculation' is based upon past events, i.e. the already published books. It is analysis of what has already been published. It would be very odd indeed if wiki prohibited people reporting what people think about already published books.Sandpiper12:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not all sources are valid and reliable...Fans publishing their own theories have no more reliability on paper than on the web. As for "widespread", that's Sandpiper's own unsubstanciated opinion...Folken de Fanel12:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't originally write this section (or I don't think so), but it seems I am in the middle of a war defending it from Folken de Fanel. It strikes me one of the refs in the third para ought to be changed to show where in the books the actual quote came from (apparently CoS ch18), but the other ref indicates that Granger's book has several pages about this. Perhaps you would be so good as to revert your own reversion? Sandpiper12:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. On another page I half seriously suggested there ought to be a special barnstar for anyone who did get involved. Sandpiper12:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, sorry i'm not sure if this is where and how to post messages but i'm sorry for attacking him, I just seen his edit as senseless, he wiped out the whole list of in transfers to Liverpool, something I was looking to check up on, why did he need to do this— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.111.108 (talk • contribs)
Dear NeoNerd, thank you for you request for help wth your userpage, which really flatters me! :) And for reminding me that I still had that notice at my userpage, which I now removed. I've made a litlle gift for you at your userpage - I hope you like it! Since you told me you liked my own design, I adapted it with a new color scheme for you. Let me know if that's ok with you, k sweetie? Love, Phaedriel - 18:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your not nice. I was creating a historical reference which is very much verifiable with profit 100 on the history of our company which has been a intergral part of the community here for 20 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AuroraMicro (talk • contribs)
I'm sorry that i interfered with your article AuroraMicrosystems, it is that i am trying to make up for previous mistakes, as you may have found out if you read my user page. Again, i apologise. It is also that i am relatively new.
Danielspencer9114:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Daniel, i didn't know you were trying to help with AuroraMicrosystems . The information about the security issues were removed because they were false. I understand the need for positive and negative information within the articles on here, but for me it must be accurate and truthful information. I have edited the article to be more balanced and added in historical and informational links relating to not only Aurora but the great city we live and participate in. JoeD8215:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It will remain the article, at least in the trivia section. There is no reason not to have it in the trivia section...I mean look you and I have both seen ridicolious stuff in trivia sections, so there would be no reason as to why my edit won't remain in that article in some form. Brownstone99919:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
Hello NeoNerd, FeralWolf has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Someone had already created a link to the spellbound page on Gothic_4:_Genesis ,though page wasnt created then. So I simply think "So this page was intented to be created" and i took initiative to srart the page. I think wikipedia is online encyclopedia , so there is nothing wrong with a game developer company to appear on it.By the way,this company will develop the gothic 4 which is sequel to a known series PC RPG.Fotte
Yours is a perfectly reasonable question, Neo. There is no evidence presented that this company is notable, or that their game is notable. Where are the newspaper, magazine or book references to this admittedly-small software developer or its game(s)? We're not talking Electronic Arts here. If the company and its game are notable, you have to provide some evidence for it. (And a proposed sequel to a notable game is not inherently notable; notability is not inherited, nor is it contagious.) Hey, I used to write for the gaming industry back in the day; I'm not hostile to gaming-related material. --Orange Mike | Talk16:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hii there.. I'm really new/ reading the help sections and trying to get it correct. Im adding the {{hangon}} tag while I get the correct text up.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecorey (talk • contribs)
Decline reason: You need to copy the code given to you by the MediaWiki software so that it includes your IP address. Please follow the procedure above as it is written. Thanks. — Hersfold(t/a/c)23:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
A tag has been placed on Baker Oil Tools (BOT), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Toytown Mafia (talk) 16:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tagged it with speedy deletion because it has little more than a sentence saying that it was a market leader. It may be referenced, but I think it needs more notability than that. On reflection, perhaps a speedy deletion is a little hasty, but I still think it needs a lot more to justify its presence. Toytown Mafia (talk) 16:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, saw your note on my talk that you would be interested in adopting and helping me out, would gladly appreciate that. I am completely lost when dealing with the technical workings of the Wiki, though I would love to contribute, I simply am not sure how to do so with the mechanisms that Wiki offers. Rledaman (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please look at the history section I have posted onto the YBNP site.
I dont mind the fascist tag, as long as you understand that this is a new organisation. Therefore I believe that in the interests of compromise and balance you should regad it as such.
I will find you the link to the article about the left threatening to kill our members
