User talk:Neoyamaneko

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

この利用者は上級の日本語ができます。

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Neoyamaneko! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 537 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Dandy Sakano - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on BoA. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Me reverting your edits that do not support your claim is NOT bad faith. MS (Talk|Contributions) 07:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

If you are not aware of the three revert rule then consider this a warning. I have broken it already and you just did with this edit. All editors are not allowed to make more than three reverts in 24 hours if either of us reverts again, we might get banned for it. So do not revert until the 24 hour restriction has passed and of course this applies to me also. MS (Talk|Contributions) 07:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shin-chan

Hi! I looked at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Crayon_Shin-chan_characters_%28FUNimation%29&diff=327978633&oldid=327953718

I have a very simple rebuttal; without ample critical commentary and reception information that would warrant separate articles, there is no justification whatsoever for having two separate articles on Shinchan characters. As for Robotech and Macross, the main Shin-chan article covers the FUNimation and Phuuz dubs in addition to the manga. If the parent articles are separate, the child articles are, and if the parent articles are in one place, then the child ones are in one place.

This time I will not forget the issue - I will contact the anime and manga wikiproject and ask for help merging the two articles. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Theis

Please note that this material is being inserted by a block-evading IP address. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/ECW500 for more background and if you have any questions, please let me know. TN X Man 14:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Rapeman

The article The Rapeman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable manga/anime, unreferenced for over a year now

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Therapemanmovie.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Therapemanmovie.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Therapeman.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Therapeman.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:37, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Thane Camus

Please refrain from attacking other articles as you did at Thane Camus. Calling somebody a douchebag is not going to resolve any issues you have with that editor. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 03:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thane Camus text

Neoyamameko I'm writing on behalf of Thane management company. You have the provided incorrect information regarding Thane's lawsuit. I would also like you to stop referencing articles that give a negative impression of Thane. At same time I realized today that I should not “undue” all of your text and leave that which is factual. My apologies and I will stop doing so in the future. I hope we can find a common ground to make a accurate entry for Thane's page in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaikuner (talk • contribs) 06:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. It is sourced information and by wiki policy allowed to stay. I suggest you take issue with Japanprobe, get them to retract their stories, and by that way get my sourced edits eliminated. Otherwise, eliminating information because you don't like it is censorship, which is against wiki rules and eliminating information because Thane (whom you allegedly represent) doesn't like it is making it an autobiography which is also against wiki policy. Take issue with Japanprobe, but until you get them to retract their stories, the information stays.Neoyamaneko (talk) 10:04, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Reisyeti.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Reisyeti.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 06:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lord Have Mercy (rapper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lord Have Mercy (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Have Mercy (rapper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — ξ ^xplicit 04:48, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Neoyamaneko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neoyamaneko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lord Have Mercy (rapper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lord Have Mercy (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Have Mercy (rapper) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 16:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]