User talk:NeverSeenLight

Speedy deletion of New horizon christian acedemy

A tag has been placed on New horizon christian acedemy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mfield (talk) 23:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of New horizon christian acedemy

A tag has been placed on New horizon christian acedemy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 19:57, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of New Horizon Christian Academy

I have nominated New Horizon Christian Academy, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Horizon Christian Academy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mfield (talk) 09:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Mfield (talk) 09:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Pharmboy. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kuru ^talk 12:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:Pharmboy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Res 2216 firestar 20:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User:Pharmboy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Res 2216 firestar 20:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Pharmboy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Res 2216 firestar 20:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Pharmboy. Res 2216 firestar 20:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Please don't insult other users, that's not how we do things here. I've blocked your account for now, but I'd be happy to unblock it if you give me a promise to stop. If you believe this block is unjustified and wish to have another admin review it you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. henrik•talk 21:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Big Missunderstanding and i hope you can unblock me

hey i dont know what is happening with my account someone else that has been using my computer has been writing all those crud things. i am deeply sorry for this and it will never happen again. if you could unblock me it would be greatly appreciated. i am a person with great respect for others and would never purposely vandalize other users pages or anything. i hope you can forget about this sticky situation and we can go on to better this site. thank you so much.

No worries, but you'll need to show some good faith before I can unblock you. I'm going to request that you try to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =) and save the page before you improve it.
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you can add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. henrik•talk 22:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mmm i dont think i can do that i am extremely busy with school and barely have enough time to look at my account here. i am also in a program that limits my time on the computer so i dont know if i will have time. Is there anything else i could do??

Don't worry, there's no time limit - it's perfectly alright to do it in bits and pieces and take as long time as you like. henrik•talk 22:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

let me reword what i said, i am in a program which will not allow me to write anything for you. i am sorry. and i dont even understand why i have to write it cause someone else went on my account here at the program i am in and did that stuff to get me blocked. so if you could help me out it would be greatly appreciated.

You don't need to write an entirely new article, just post some improvements to one. I understand your concern, but until you have the time and possibility to improve articles (which is what wikipedia is about), I'm afraid the matter has to stand. henrik•talk 10:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok i have this that needs to be fixed from vandilizm, i dont know who did this but this is what i will do for you and Wikapedia. this person needs to be stopped, saying crud things like this is wrong on Wikapedia. hope this can help me in being unblocked, thank you. reply soon and get that article fixed. Perspective (cognitive) In conflict resolution a technique of using " PENISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS I LOVE PENISSSSSSSSSI", "me", "my" language encourages the person to talk from their own point of view. This helps to get the antagonist to better understand the speakers feelings, needs, experiences circumventing the need for discussion. Talking about your own point of view brings it up on the other person to be more understanding and cooperative. Since it takes effort to see the situation from another persons point of view, the opponent is disarmed unless they are willing to put in the extra effort or are sincerely interested in being helpful. This is the opposite of solicitation because in soliciting the speaker is the one offering their services.

Proposed deletion of New Horizon Christian Academy

The article New Horizon Christian Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub for non-notable closed private school.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Horizon Christian Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Horizon Christian Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Horizon Christian Academy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 05:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]