User talk:Nhoctu2050

Welcome!

Hello, Nhoctu2050, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! TransporterMan (TALK) 20:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Dengero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Old Master Q because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dengero (talk) 14:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gun lists

Hi, Nhoctu. Thank you for working to improve Wikipedia. I note that you have been adding lists of guns to a number of media articles. One of those lists became the center of a dispute at Talk:Shanghai_(2010_film) and I've removed another for the same reasons from Lucky Luke. Other users have removed them for similar reasons from Old Master Q and Halloween II (2009 film). The first problem is that they're too much detail and not enough importance for the article and are prohibited by the undue weight policy (read the discussion at Talk:Shanghai_(2010_film) for a more complete explanation and some quotes). Most or all of the lists which you have added are going to be removed for that reason, but before you get involved in discussions about whether or not to keep them in the articles you need to know about a much more serious problem, however. It is the question of where you're getting these very specific identifications of weapons. All information in Wikipedia must be proven by a reliable source, but with media items the media items themselves can be such a source. Using something like that, however, as a source for itself is considered a primary source and the primary source policy says, very strictly, "Do not analyze, synthesize, interpret, or evaluate material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so." If you are viewing these films yourself and identifying the guns, that's clearly a violation of that policy. So even if the list is not too detailed for the article, there still may be a very difficult problem to deal with under Wikipedia policy unless you can show that the guns are actually identified by name in the movie or comic book somehow or unless you can show that there is a reliable third party source that identifies them as being in that work. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:24, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thanh Trúc

The article Thanh Trúc has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ochib (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hoàng Yến Chibi

The article Hoàng Yến Chibi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 05:31, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terror Trap for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terror Trap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terror Trap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 02:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]