Jump to content

User talk:Nicholishiell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nicholishiell, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Nicholishiell! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Nested Neutron Spectrometer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As reviewing administrator, I apologize for the prior reviews of your article. I think the latest reviewer in particular didn't seem to understand that the references were not omitted, merely repeated, which is a trivial style error. I simply normalized the style and accepted he article. However, this really needs additional references from other sources, written by people other than those who developed the device. Please add them as soon as possible, following the style presently in the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]