User talk:Nidza213

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stupid! has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stupid! was changed by Nidza213 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954517 on 2017-05-19T17:30:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nidza213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think I should be unblocked from editing wikipedia pages as this block happend 2 years ago and I think I will never do anything like that again, even though it was just 1 edit it did maybe cause damage to some people. I am sorry for my actions. I think that a permanent ban from editing is a unreal punishment for doing wrong things in editing 1 page, 1 time. Nidza213 (talk) 08:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While two years is certainly enough time for you to have changed, saying that you "think" you won't do vandalism again is not convincing enough. It will also help to know what it is that you intend to edit. Note that the block(not ban, which is different) is not permanent, it is of undefined length, it will only last until you convince an administrator it should be removed. As this does not do that, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You only *think* you will never do anything like that again? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]