User talk:Noilaedi

Apologies in advance. - Me

Welcome!

Hi Noilaedi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

November 2022

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of common misconceptions, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize for that. I only used the same sources referenced in the articles of Donkey Kong (Character) the E.T. video game, and the Atari video game burial. While the official reason for my revoked edits are not this, I do think that if those sources are wrong, they might need to be changed in those respective articles. Noilaedi (talk) 19:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The most critical issue relates to the four inclusion criteria for adding an item in the article. You can see these displayed prominently if you open an edit window in the article. More specifically, your addition fails two of the criteria, the most notable of which is the second criterion: "The item is reliably sourced, both with respect to the factual contents of the item and the fact that it is a common misconception." (bold added) The sources must identify it as a common misconception, meaning widely known among the general population, not just a specific group of people. Lots of items have been added with that deficiency and have been removed. For example, in my field of work the are some misconceptions among the small group of people with my expertise, but most people have never heard of them. For that reason, it's usually best to make a suggestion on the article talk page and wait for responses. Sundayclose (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gish gallop, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please add a reliable source, and also consider re-phrasing your addition as it does not fully make sense as written - maybe some words are missing? MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate use of "minor edit"

Hi Noilaedi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the edits you mark as minor are not minor edits. Please carefully read WP:MINOR. Sundayclose (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lost Media has been nominated for deletion

Category:Lost Media has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 18:09, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stat Squish

Hello, Noilaedi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stat Squish, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stat Squish

Hello, Noilaedi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stat Squish".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:56, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vinny Vinesauce

Hello, Noilaedi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vinny Vinesauce, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vinny Vinesauce

Hello, Noilaedi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vinny Vinesauce".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]