User talk:Nolimitsnate

Hello! Welcome to my talk page! This is where you can ask me questions, as well as alert me about specific topics!

Things you should know: - There is a list of things that I'd prefer I wasn't asked available on my user page. Please check this before anything else. - I get mad/angry easily, so please forgive me if I'm sometimes not the happy user I say I am. - Please use this page to ask me questions, not my user page. Since I am not a living Wikipedia, please visit the Teahouse for info about editing, how to use Wikipedia, and any other questions you may have about topics not related to me.

December 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nolimitsnate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Who would I be a sockpuppet of? Please unblock me. I am not a sockpuppet. I am trying to be calm about this, so please unblock me, because I don't know any user I could be a sockpuppet of.

Decline reason:

Confirmed to WaterflameIsAwesome. Yamla (talk) 22:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's finally time I give up. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 02:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WaterflameIsAwesome: Further response: Your antics (changing block messages, this sock) are very obvious. Appeal your block on your main account using UTRS and follow others' advice.

It may be too late since you have created another account, but I don't know.

Otherwise, the standard offer is still available, but it could have been a very easy unblock if you just followed others' advice (and didn't make this account). – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 03:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- TNT (talk • she/they) 03:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:WaterflameIsAwesome per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WaterflameIsAwesome. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/they) 03:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]