User talk:NormalPerson7

NormalPerson7, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NormalPerson7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Bella Vista

see WP:PEACOCK 208.85.166.101 (talk) 21:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I made a mistake in reverting your edit and I have since reinstated your edit. I left a message on your talk page to this effect. — NormalPerson7 (talk) 21:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nagapattinam district

I did nothing related to vandalism. Nagapattinam district article was incomplete and had errors. That's what I decided to edit. Gershon Jonish (talk) 07:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I apologise, your edit was removing vandalism not adding it. Thank you for removing vandalism, it is appreciated, and sorry for making this mistake. Feel free to remove the message on your talk page. — NormalPerson7 (talk) 08:08, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert

Your revert is ill-considered. It is a major aspect of his notability. Read the article please. --2604:2000:E010:1100:9160:F31:8C4B:E90 (talk) 13:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct; I reverted your edit without looking too deeply into the subject. I personally do not feel that this information belongs on this list, but that may just be my personal preference, and you can certainly make a case for it though, so I'm not going to re-revert you if you add this information back. — NormalPerson7 (talk) 13:29, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Just as there is a category for insider trading - which you may personally dislike -- it is an aspect of notability. --2604:2000:E010:1100:9160:F31:8C4B:E90 (talk) 13:31, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

USW

For your information, the word "usw" that you have removed in Associative property is the abbreviation of "und so weiter", the German equivalent of "and so on". D.Lazard (talk) 08:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Still, probably shouldn't be in an English language article. — NormalPerson7 (talk) 13:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Tpdwkouaa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Heathers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 21:48, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, we had an edit conflict there. I was only trying to undo your typo, fun -> gun, not sure how that happened. — NormalPerson7 (talk) 21:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic

The article said: Climate tipping points are of particular interest in reference to concerns about global warming in the modern era.

I wrote: Climate tipping points are of particular concern because of global warming which is occurring in the modern era. You reverted back to the original claiming it is more encyclopedic. Tipping points are of huge concern. Describing them as merely of interest downplays their significance. I don't see anything encyclopedic about that. Yaklib (talk) 07:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yaklib: It was just my personal preference. It's not a big deal, I just thought the previous version read slightly better. In particular I just thought stacked subordinate clauses ("A because B which is C") sounded a bit clunky. I don't really mind either way. Perhaps I should've been clearer about that in my edit summary. — NormalPerson7 (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Surely "A related to B because of C related to D is even clunkier. Since you don't mind, I will change it back. Yaklib (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Yaklib: first, please allow me to say I'm not mad and I'm not complaining. I'm just trying to do a little friendly process teaching. The best place to discuss content changes is at the talk page of the article being discussed. That's because there are multiple editors watching each page, and third parties may want to join the discussion. If you want to get a specific editor's attention, you may include the optional template to "ping" them, which is how I pinged you in this comment. With respect to the edit you two are discussing, I'm mildly troubled by "of particular concern"... which is true..... on the other hand, we also have to do what we do within the requirements of our neutrality policy. I haven't made up my mind what I think about that turn of phrase, and if I decide to follow up on that I will do so at the article in a bold edit, or on the article talk page. Thanks again for caring, I like what I see in your edits so far. Happy editing! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]