User talk:Noseallergy

Welcome!

Hello, Noseallergy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Claudia Morales, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 00:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Claudia Morales

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Claudia Morales, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudia Morales (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Spiderone were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Claudia Morales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noseallergy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, Noseallergy. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Anas Anwar Al-Qatefy has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Noseallergy/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Noseallergy/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You said on the talk page of this draft that you have re-written this article after my first version was speedily deleted. This version has remedied every aspect of promotional or sales language that got it deleted originally. It is up to an admin to decide whether the page is so promotional that it needs to be deleted, but it is just not the case that all of the promotional and sales language has been removed. Phraseology like:

Morales's design style seamlessly blends modern aesthetics with functionality, drawing inspiration from design luminaries such as...Her designs feature open concepts, a motif inspired by her experiences in Rome in 1988.
Subsequently, she ventured to New York City to delve deeper into her passion.
This distinctive educational setting instilled in her the values of critical thinking, independence, and academic excellence, fostering an environment that embraced international diversity rooted in mutual respect and cooperation.

sounds much closer to an advertisement than the kind of neutral, detached language that Wikipedia articles are meant to use. Is it possible you have some kind of personal connection to the subject of the article? This can sometimes explain why people fail to see how their writing is promotional, even when it is evident to others.

In either case, I'd suggest reading some guidance like Words to Watch and WP:EPSTYLE for a fuller understanding of encyclopaedic tone. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you say it is "up to an admin" to decide whether the page is promotional, does that mean that an admin will review it? Are you the admin who made the decision? It is so confusing. Is the page already deleted or is someone else going to review it.

I mimicked nearly EXACTLY the same words and language as several other biographies found in Wikipedia. This is why I am stumped as to what is wrong with this version. All of my word choices are being used on current biographies of several people on Wikipedia.

Please point me to where I can know EXACTLY what needs changing. If I change the wording, will it just be unacceptable due to not enough citations? That was also mentioned on one of the comments from WikiOriginal-9. Please clarify.

Thanks. Noseallergy (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we review any page tagged for Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as spam and decide whether to delete or decline. Best, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean that an admin will review it, yes. Anyone can request speedy deletion (that's me, in this case), but pages are only actually speedily deleted if an administrator (which I am not) is satisfied the page unambiguously meets one of the relevant criteria. Your page has now been deleted; it had not been when you posted your comment, but it has in the time I've been typing mine.

I don't know which pages you were copying from; if indeed you closely mirrored their language, I would be interested to find these pages, as it sounds like they need to be quite seriously edited. Like I said above, I think it would be good if you read guidance like the "Words to Watch" page in the manual of style; the problem with the page, as I saw it, was that almost all of it was phrased in ways that served to promote and editorialise about the subject, rather than describe it dispassionately.

Even if you did rewrite the page using neutral language, it would retain the notability problem that @WikiOriginal-9 mentioned, yes. Being neutrally written and demonstrably notable (through reference to independent sources are two requirements which must both be fulfilled for a page to be on Wikipedia. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Noseallergy/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Noseallergy/Claudia Morales has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Noseallergy/Claudia Morales. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. I saw it. where can I start a fresh draft where I can edit the title and all of the text, plus add in new citations, etc. ? I can't seem to be able to edit a prior deleted version. Thanks. Noseallergy (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]