User talk:NoyPiOka
This is NoyPiOka's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
You wanna talk?
[edit]Go ahead, heap your abuse, I don't care.
Kindly give me some reasons why you want to delete the Santiago Villafania entry? ~~malagilion / santiago villafania~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malagilion (talk • contribs) 06:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Don't you know that you are not supposed to write a Wikipedia article about yourself Mr. Villafania? NoyPiOka (talk) 04:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
points taken. i merely dictated what should be edited. but thanks for your help anyway. malagilion (talk) 08:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]![]() |
Hi NoyPiOka! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Dear NoyPiOka, I've seen that the article "Gaston Javier Algard" entered on the Articles for deletion page. Since then this page improved a lot. Can you please give me some advise about what should we do more to have this page out of Articles for deletion page? Thank you very much for your help!
Tanjamilo (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- I nominated this for deletion because it fails the criteria for notability of an author. Have you proven that Gaston Javier Algard is notable? I don't think so. And you can not have the article simply "out of the Articles for deletion page". That discussion will be closed by the admins once consensus has been reached, with either a "delete" or "keep". I personally think the final consensus will be "delete". NoyPiOka (talk) 09:27, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
CSD Declined
[edit]Hi. Just to let you know that I have declined a couple of your nominations for speedy deletion (Philippine Normal University – Agusan del Sur Army ROTC and Emilio Aguinaldo College ROTC) as educational institutions are not legible for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. If you still think these articles should be deleted, then I would suggest WP:AFD. Stephen! Coming... 07:58, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- These articles are not educational institutions per se, these are simply ROTC units of those schools. See the difference? NoyPiOka (talk) 09:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- I can only by what is on the page for a description, and make my best judgement based on that. Both describes themselves as training units, which makes them educational institutes, albeit borderline cases. In instances like these, admins are advised to give the benefit of the doubt and not delete. Stephen! Coming... 10:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Had 'em AfD'd. Cheers! NoyPiOka (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- I can only by what is on the page for a description, and make my best judgement based on that. Both describes themselves as training units, which makes them educational institutes, albeit borderline cases. In instances like these, admins are advised to give the benefit of the doubt and not delete. Stephen! Coming... 10:22, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
This CEO seems to be notable enough. I have removed the prod from this article, but am letting the others you nominated to expire. Bearian (talk) 17:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)