User talk:OU Comms

Welcome!

Hello, OU Comms, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Tim Berners-Lee, et al.[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tim Berners-Lee, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (Diff) Nightscream (talk) 01:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The real reason that it was reverted was that you failed to provide a citation to support the assertion. Your edit to Bill Benyon has the same problem. See the Five Pillars of Wikipedia in the welcome. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming round to your talk page to make the same remark. Please find some publication (surely somewhere on the OU website?) which lists the honorary graduates, and provide links to it. If you don't know how to format references, just ask and someone will help. Thanks. PamD (talk) 11:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To expand: has the OU got an equivalent of http://tldynamic.leeds.ac.uk/leedsyorkshire/honorary/honorary_graduates.asp ? If not, does the list of honorary graduates get published in a national newspaper? There must surely be some public source where people can verify that someone is an honorary graduate of the OU, and your editor-name suggests that you're well placed to know of it! Please help us all by adding a link to such a source. PamD (talk) 11:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And it would also be useful to link Honorary degree and Open University in your additions: you and I know what the OU is, but remember that WikiPedia is an international encyclopedia and many readers will not. Thanks. PamD (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've upgraded your addition to Lynne Brindley, and moved it to a more logical place in the article, under "Awards" alongside several other honorary degrees. It makes a better article that way. I found a source by googling, but you may know a better one. PamD (talk) 12:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced material to articles, as you did with this edit to Tim Berners-Lee. Doing this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. If you continue to ignore these admonishments, and re-add the material, you will be blocked from editing.

In addition, subjects of biographical articles are generally referred to by their last name, not their first name. Lastly, make sure you provide an Edit Summary for your edits, as this is required. Nightscream (talk) 03:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please listen![edit]

You are adding unsourced and unlinked material to many articles. You could do it so much better. Some of your additions are likely to be deleted - Wikipedia is very careful about information about living people. Please read the above and act on it, to save us all time. Thanks. PamD (talk) 12:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Position within article[edit]

If there's an "Honours and awards" section, then that's the place for an honorary degree - see Barbara Castle, Baroness Castle of Blackburn, which I've now fixed. Please stop your disruptive addition of unlinked and unsourced content. PamD (talk) 06:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. PamD (talk) 06:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Username[edit]

Hi, your username is a promotional username which is against Wikipedia's username policy. You may request a username change at Wikipedia:Changing username otherwise this account will be blocked.BigDunc^Talk 10:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COI[edit]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. BigDunc^Talk 10:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OU Comms. You have new messages at PamD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Because Wikipedia does not allow any form of spam or other promotion of people, products, companies or other groups (even non-commercial or charitable ones). Wikipedia's use for such purposes will result in the blocking of the account involved. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for our rules about this.

In addition, user accounts are for individuals only, not for companies or groups or other collective editing. Your username should reflect this. Usernames that appear to be promotional (such as those that make reference to a company or product) violate our username policy and are grounds for blocking.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than yourself, your group, company or product, you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message box.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Tell us what new username you want to use. Please make sure that your new username does not violate our username policy and check that it has not already been taken here.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If instead you believe that you have been blocked by mistake (i.e., you have not in fact been using Wikipedia for promotional purposes), please write {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message box and replace the text "Your reason here" with the reason why. See also Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information.

Which Couve de Murville?[edit]

Are you sure the OU degree went to French diplomat Maurice Couve de Murville and not to his cousin, RC Bishop of Birmingham (and involved in HE), Maurice Noël Léon Couve de Murville? Without a reference it's not easy to check. PamD (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could do better![edit]

Hi, OU Comms. If you or any of your colleagues return to Wikipedia to continue to add information about OU honorary degrees, or anything else, please do so more carefully. I've just spent time patching up your input, out of some vague loyalty to OU as a former (possibly ongoing) student. I've established that you allocated a degree to the wrong Couve de Murville (it was the Bishop of Birmingham, not the French diplomat), and moved various mentions to more appropriate places in articles, and given a link to honorary degree and to Open University, and added the "citation needed" tag to each entry as you didn't have the courtesy to tell us your source - this is especially important in regard to living people, as most of your subjects are. If you edit Wikipedia in future, I'm sure your contributions could be much better than this lot! Thanks. PamD (talk) 15:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]