User talk:Oldus66

Welcome!

Hello, Oldus66, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tremaris, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tremaris

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tremaris, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:07, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Tremaris

Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Tremaris. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tremaris

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tremaris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lithorien (talk) 01:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at U.S. Route 66, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 72Dino (talk) 00:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Falls of Neuse Road

The article Falls of Neuse Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. This road is not notable, although the bridge might be.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imzadi 1979 → 19:51, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Falls of Neuse Road

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Falls of Neuse Road, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Imzadi 1979 → 19:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Falls of Neuse Road

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Falls of Neuse Road, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. –Fredddie ™ 20:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing the block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldus66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thought I was doing good Oldus66 (talk) 20:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Several different editors attempted to explain how your good intentions ran counter to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. That should've been a clue. Please read WP:GAB. Tiderolls 20:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone Help!!!

Can someone whois trustworthy keep up my articles like neuse river trail. Please.

Thanks, Oldus66 (talk) 20:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can Imzadi 1979 give me Falls of Neuse Rd.

Hey Imzadi 1979. Can you please give me my article back. Not on the web but some other way so I can have it to keep. Please do this for me. I will be back in about an hour to check.

Thanks a lot, --Oldus66 (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone tell me an answer

First if Fastily lifts my ban to just my page can I put my road articles their. I am looking for fastily to answer this.

--Oldus66 (talk) 20:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing the block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldus66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not read your guidlines so I never knew and I did try to help. I think it is an accoplishment to get on Wikipedia so that's why I created my articles. Oldus66 (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on your contributions, I fail to see how you can contribute constructively here. Getting an article on Wikipedia isn't an "accoplishment" [sic] when it is disruptive and contrary to the purposes of building an encyclopedia and established consensus related to that. Kinu ^t/_c 21:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can I?

Can someone answer the question about the user page of mine. --Oldus66 (talk) 20:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

I like my page even though it is a lot of notices. Oldus66 (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

An editor cannot remove declined unblock requests while the block is in place. This is to give reviewing admins a full picture of the situation. Thanks Tiderolls 21:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to edit this page disruptively I will block your ability to edit it. Tiderolls 21:19, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What can I delete?

It is simple. What can I delete on this page.

Indeed, it is simple. You may read the guidelines at WP:BLANKING. However, archiving is preferable to deletion. Tiderolls 21:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry. I do do this a lot so I hope you think I mean it.

Can I?

Can I please edit my user page. I want to take everything off of it and replace it with new.

You edited your talk page with the post above as well as the unblock request below. Pay attention...this is important; if an administrator percieves that you are editing your talk page disruptively they may remove your ability to edit your user talk page. That includes unblock requests that do not address the issue that resulted in your block. So far you have made nothing but unblock requests that do not address those issues. I advise you, in the strongest possible way, to remove your latest request, read WP:GAB and then ask any questions here on points you do not understand. Do not pose your questions in an unblock request; simply begin a new section. I will help you any way I am able but you are quickly headed towards an area from which there is little hope of return. Please choose your next action carefully. Tiderolls 22:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I do get off What should I do to not have this again?

Hi Wikipedian's, I do have little hope for me or my brother but If I do get off of this block then what should I do after it? Can someone please respond.--Oldus66 (talk) 15:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is that!

Can someone explain to me what is on my user page!

Certainly. Given that you have expressed the intention of creating a competitor to wikipedia, the link provided in the above unblock decline tells you how to do so. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hello all wikipedian's. I am very sorry for what I did. Though this is blocking my brother who is User:USroute66. It would be greatly apreciated for you to let him go as he pleases and delete my account all together.

Promise

If I get off this block then I will always check what is open and try to never vandalize. I promise this and I always keep my promises. --Oldus66 (talk) 16:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I join a group?

I really want to join the US roads wikipedia project. I will do only as told to do and will not vandalize. My intrest is roads so I really want to join it. And if I new what to write about I would be happy and you would have to stop worring about me and my appealing blocks. Please. --Oldus66 (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring block notices

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldus66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to make your wikipedia website better. These all are real things and it really hurts my feelings that whenever I post an article 5 seconds later I see a speedy deletion. The only article taht lasted for more than an hour was Falls of Neuse Road. p.s. Can I have my Falls of Neuse article back. Not on the web but just for a keepsake of what I tried. Oldus66 (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you had taken the time or the trouble to actually learn how to work here then we would not be having this conversation. The fault lies in your articles, and in your failure to react to messages on your talk-page; ther fault is not in wikipedia. The fact that you still fail to appreciate why it is that your submissions did not make wikipedia better leave me with very little hope of your ever benefitting the encyclopedia. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oldus66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to make the website better. There is a problem. With YOU. Not Wikipedia. I would like to think I was apreciated but NOO! You do not take the time to research these things. I have written truthful things on here and you thought I was making a joke out of it. I will give you a link just to testify that Falls of the Neuse Road is an actual road.http://wakecountyroads.com/nwc/falls.html Now there is not a link for Tremaris but there are books. I would have been happy if you just put a redirect to Kate Constable. I will say this. If this contuines you will have a competitor. I already have started this but I decised to give you a little grace on it but if some of these do not go through I WILL START IT AGAIN. --Oldus66 (talk) 23:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please do! If you need them, you can find instructions for creating your own version of Wikipedia here. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 02:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Per WP:BLANKING, you may not remove block notices or denied unblock requests while blocked. They have been restored. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]